The "real" challenge technology presents isn't that it replaces workers, but rather displaces them.
The robots perform tasks that humans previously performed. The fear is that they are replacing human jobs, eliminating work in distribution centers and elsewhere in the economy. It is not hard to imagine that technology might be a major factor causing persistent unemployment today and threatening “more to come.”
Surprisingly, the managers of distribution centers and supply chains see things rather differently: in surveys they report that they can’t hire enough workers, at least not enough workers who have the necessary skills to deal with new technology. “Supply chain” is the term for the systems used to move products from suppliers to customers. Warehouse robots are not the first technology taking over some of the tasks of supply chain workers, nor are they even seen as the most important technology affecting the industry today.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/04/scarce-skills-not-scarce-jobs/390789/
(Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday April 29 2015, @06:21PM
Rather than whinging about how you can't find robot mechanics to keep your robots in shape, how about hiring just about anyone who's handy with tools, then teaching them to fix robots?
Ever since the dot-com boom I've repeatedly heard that employers want "someone who can hit the ground running". Now they're complaining that they can't find someone who can hit the ground at all. Whereas I have twenty-seven years of experience doing all manner of different things, yet cannot find a job because I am regarded as unskilled and inexperienced.
That doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.
Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
(Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Wednesday April 29 2015, @06:48PM
Rather than whinging about how you can't find robot mechanics to keep your robots in shape, how about hiring just about anyone who's handy with tools, then teaching them to fix robots?
Not only would this solve the job problem, it would also likely create a more loyal employee, assuming (a big if!) that the employer treats the employee well. Too many places want a lot of experience, then find out the experienced person needs almost as much training and time to learn the particular system as a new trainee would need. Of course, the employers balance that out by trying to offer the experienced person wages that used to go to a brand new employee.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by tibman on Wednesday April 29 2015, @07:26PM
I agree on the institutional knowledge thing. Very few people can be hired with enough institutional knowledge to jump right into the work. It can take weeks to figure out how some systems work and months to understand all their quirks.
SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Wednesday April 29 2015, @07:34PM
Not only would this solve the job problem, it would also likely create a more loyal employee,
You assume that there is anyone in the company that knows a single thing about fixing the robots.
Often that's not true. If it breaks they call the manufacturer, or the installer, and wait for repairs, or replacement. You really can't afford to keep a person on staff to fix things that seldom (if ever) break. If they break frequently, its cheaper to buy a new one, or push that repair responsibility back to the manufacturer with a maintenance contract.
So maybe the jobs go to the maintenance contracts, and employees disappear. Or maybe the manufacturer engineers failure out of the system, and replace it with a much smaller preventative maintenance contract.
I've been on both sides of that paradigm.
I've seen jobs contracted out from under employees I worked with, including myself.
I've accepted contracts that I knew replaced full time workers.
Oddly, this latter category gave me no sleepless nights. We were able to easily handle the work contracted to us with less than a quarter of a full time equivalent. The prior full time employee had been sand bagging for years, yet his system documentation consisted only of a few post-it notes.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 4, Touché) by WillR on Wednesday April 29 2015, @06:57PM
Rather than whinging about how you can't find robot mechanics to keep your robots in shape, how about hiring just about anyone who's handy with tools, then teaching them to fix robots?
How does that raise next quarter's earnings-per-share?
(Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Wednesday April 29 2015, @07:52PM
-n.
Among the reasons I don't seek VC is that I have seen the smoking craters that resulted from "investors" who just wanted my employers to go public on wall street.
If your horizon is only a quarter away, how can you carry out a plan that takes five years to complete?
Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Freeman on Wednesday April 29 2015, @08:21PM
Have a string of quarter goals that fit within the five year plan. That wouldn't happen though as that would require planning and initiative.
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"