Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Thursday April 30 2015, @10:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the at-least-somebody-understands-the-problem dept.

Security and privacy are not mutually exclusive says Europe’s privacy watchdog – and people should stop saying they are.

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), Giovanni Buttarelli, told a Brussels conference he was concerned that “the objective of cyber-security may be misused to justify measures which weaken protection of [data protection] rights.”

“Cyber-security must not become an excuse for disproportionate processing of personal data. Let's not forget that when the European Court of Justice (ECJ) last year found the Data Retention Directive to be invalid, one of the reasons was concern about the inadequacy of the data security provisions in the directive,” he continued . Although some commentators interpreted the ECJ ruling to mean that data must be stored within national borders, Buttarelli disagreed.

“Physical location is not the determining factor in security. Rather, it is degree of control, accountability and responsibility which data controllers demonstrate when processing personal information. They must take full responsibility for all the measures they implement, regardless of the technology they use. Responsibility must not vanish in the clouds,” said the newly appointed EDPS. Negotiations on a new Data Protection Regulation are currently underway and Buttarelli says that accountability should not be sacrificed in the inevitable compromise.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by AnonTechie on Thursday April 30 2015, @08:40PM

    by AnonTechie (2275) on Thursday April 30 2015, @08:40PM (#177250) Journal

    Airbus to sue NSA, German spies accused of swiping tech secrets:

    European aerospace giant Airbus is promising legal action over claims its top blueprints were stolen by German spies and given to America's intelligence agencies.

    "We are aware that as a large company in the sector, we are a target and subject of espionage," the company said in a statement to the AFP newswire.

    "However, in this case we are alarmed because there is concrete suspicion of industrial espionage. We will now file a criminal complaint against persons unknown on suspicion of industrial espionage."

    The threat comes after days of speculation in the German press over reports that the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) – the German foreign intelligence agency – has been spying on German and European companies [theregister.co.uk] for the Americans since at least 2008.

    Spiegel Online [spiegel.de] reported that the BND's listening station at Bad Aibling in southern Bavaria was used to target up to 2,000 European concerns, including European defense company EADS, the helicopter manufacturer Eurocopter, and various French agencies. This spying was done at the behest of the NSA, and the information may have been fed back to American businesses.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/30/airbus_us_german_intelligence/ [theregister.co.uk]

    --
    Albert Einstein - "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Thursday April 30 2015, @10:40PM

    by frojack (1554) on Thursday April 30 2015, @10:40PM (#177297) Journal

    So why sue the NSA? Possession of stolen goods is all you could get them on (if even that).
    Why not sue the German thieves?

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.