Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Thursday April 30 2015, @02:32PM   Printer-friendly
from the this-explains-why-we-never-have-bars dept.

The US government will be forced to explain why its cell network kill-switch plans should be kept secret today.

Under Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 303, the US government – in particular the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – is allowed to shutdown cellphone service anywhere in the country, and even across an entire city if it feels there is a crisis situation.

However, the actual content of the policy remains secret, raising fears that it is open to abuse. For example, it's not clear who is authorized to make such a decision nor under what circumstances.

There are also groups concerned that killing of cellphone service during an emergency could make things worse.

In a frequently quoted example, San Francisco's rail system BART flipped a cell network kill-switch in several subway stations in 2011 amid a protest over a BART cop who shot and killed a drunk homeless man ( http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/12/bart_polioce_cut_mobile_phone_service/ ). Charles Hill allegedly threw a knife at an officer before the police opened fire.

The fact that the network shutdown was ordered against a public demonstration raised immediate concerns over how the policy is written and implemented.

In February 2013, sparked by the BART event and a refusal by the DHS to release the policy under a Freedom of Information Act request, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) sued the DHS ( https://regmedia.co.uk/2015/04/27/epic-case-dhs-phone-kill-switch.pdf ) [PDF] in order to get it to disclose the details.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Thursday April 30 2015, @11:18PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Thursday April 30 2015, @11:18PM (#177308) Journal

    The golden rule of secrets. They are secret because otherwise another party may take action against the party with the secret. And the only factor usually preventing this is the secrecy. So whenever something is secret it's detrimental to someone elses wishes and you have to assume the worst.

    In this case it's likely that public at large would realize that this power option is directed at them which of course no self preserving organization will allow to be public. They have nothing to win from this. The negatives from keeping it secret is less than the negatives of publication. Basic game theory.

    Oh.. you can communicate outside common spectrum without a PhD.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2