Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday May 02 2015, @04:00AM   Printer-friendly
from the everything-old-is-new-again dept.

Most new patents are combinations of existing ideas and pretty much always have been, even as the stream of fundamentally new core technologies has slowed, according to a new paper in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface by SFI researchers Hyejin Youn, Luis Bettencourt, Jose Lobo, and Deborah Strumsky.

Youn and colleagues reached those conclusions sifting through the records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Dating back to 1790, the records feature an elaborate system of technology codes—a vocabulary of sorts, in which any new invention is a phrase.

The researchers found that throughout the USPTO's history, about 40 percent of patents have been refinements on existing patents that leave the "phrase" unchanged. The rest are either new words or new phrases—and the balance between those has changed. "Suppose you write a long novel. You may emphasize the introduction of new vocabularies or the introduction of new phrases," says Youn.

[Abstract]: http://www.nature.com/nphys/journal/v11/n1/full/nphys3222.html

[Source]: http://www.santafe.edu/news/item/youn-language-patents/

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 02 2015, @07:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 02 2015, @07:37PM (#177932)

    If you look in a telescope backward, it works like a microscope. There is no wrong end to a telescope. It works fine both ways, just in different ways.

  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday May 02 2015, @08:26PM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday May 02 2015, @08:26PM (#177946) Journal

    If you look in a telescope backward, it works like a microscope. There is no wrong end to a telescope. It works fine both ways, just in different ways.

    Exactly my point. Thanks for playing.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.