Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday May 02 2015, @05:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the american-as-apple-pie dept.

Do U.S. consumers boycott products in response to international conflict? Two professors at the University of Virginia say that in the case of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the answer is "yes." Remember "freedom fries?" A brief refresher: As the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush was gearing up to wipe out what it called Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's "weapons of mass destruction," tensions were rising in the U.N. Security Council. France was deeply opposed to an attack and threatened to use its veto power to stop the action.

In the U.S., sentiment toward Paris plummeted, particularly among conservative Americans. Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly announced on the air he was boycotting French products and Capitol Hill cafeterias famously renamed French fries as "freedom fries," in an edible admonishment of the French government.

So talk of boycotts was in the air. But, as noted in a forthcoming paper in the journal Review of Economics and Statistics, measuring their economic impact has been a slippery affair.

"Most studies infer boycott behavior from indirect measures, such as bilateral trade patterns, abnormal stock market returns or consumer surveys, which are typically inconsistent with actual behavior," write associate professor of politics Sonal Pandya and business professor Rajkumar Venkatesan in their study, "French Roast: Consumer Response to International Conflict; Evidence from Supermarket Scanner Data."

It occurred to Pandya that supermarket scanners might offer some firm data on Americans' buying habits, so she and Venkatesan decided to dig deeper, studying weekly sales in 1,110 U.S. supermarkets in 50 regions across the country. For every week in 2003 they compared each store's sales of French-sounding brands to that same week in 2002. "Consumers' often use supermarket brands as an expression of their identity to others and also themselves," Venkatesan said.

[Paper]: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/REST_a_00526#.VUEShvBOKSp

[Source]: https://news.virginia.edu/content/study-tracks-us-boycott-french-sounding-products-during-2003-iraq-war

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 02 2015, @10:06PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 02 2015, @10:06PM (#177970)

    The US State Department has its own band of spys and analysts.
    They told Secretary of State Colin Powell that the Dubya/Cheney folks were lying about WMD but Powell [google.com] stuck with the party line and spouted the warmongers' bullshit to the UN.

    The French also had better spooks and analysts and they also got the answer right.
    Trusting their own guys, they chose to ignore the USAian ideologs.

    -- gewg_

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by tibman on Sunday May 03 2015, @12:33AM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Sunday May 03 2015, @12:33AM (#177984)

    I was so disappointed in Gen Powell over that. It just seemed so against his character and was unforgivable. That guy could have run for president if he would have done things a little bit different.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.