Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday May 04 2015, @10:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the this-is-your-brain-on-cosmic-rays... dept.

As NASA prepares for the first manned spaceflight to Mars, questions have surfaced concerning the potential for increased risks associated with exposure to the spectrum of highly energetic nuclei that comprise galactic cosmic rays. Animal models have revealed an unexpected sensitivity of mature neurons in the brain to charged particles found in space. Astronaut autonomy during long-term space travel is particularly critical as is the need to properly manage planned and unanticipated events, activities that could be compromised by accumulating particle traversals through the brain.

Using mice subjected to space-relevant fluences of charged particles, we show significant cortical- and hippocampal-based performance decrements 6 weeks after acute exposure. Animals manifesting cognitive decrements exhibited marked and persistent radiation-induced reductions in dendritic complexity and spine density along medial prefrontal cortical neurons known to mediate neurotransmission specifically interrogated by our behavioral tasks.

This was stated a little more readably at ScienceDaily:

What happens to an astronaut's brain during a mission to Mars? Nothing good. It's besieged by destructive particles that can forever impair cognition, according to a radiation oncology study. Exposure to highly energetic charged particles -- much like those found in the galactic cosmic rays that bombard astronauts during extended spaceflights -- cause significant damage to the central nervous system, resulting in cognitive impairments.

[Related]: Space Radiation On the Long Trip To Mars Could Make Astronauts Dumber

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Monday May 04 2015, @09:26PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday May 04 2015, @09:26PM (#178785)

    Unless my perception of space elevators is incorrect, our moon might not be a good candidate for one.

    The way I understand it, a moon/planet needs to rotate/spin on it's axis for a space elevator.

    Your perception of the Moon is incorrect. It does rotate on an axis. It also happens to be tidally locked to the Earth so you always see the same side of it. That doesn't mean it isn't rotating. From your perspective, it seems to not be moving. However, if you were standing on the Moon (and not at one of the poles), you would notice that the Sun is only visible at some times, and not at others, and these times are not fixed to the position of the Earth; this is because it's rotating as it orbits the Earth.

    You do have a good point though: if some space body were not rotating at all, you couldn't have a space elevator, because it relies on having a counterweight in geosynchronous orbit. (Or would it be called "lunasynchronous" on the Moon?)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by rts008 on Monday May 04 2015, @09:39PM

    by rts008 (3001) on Monday May 04 2015, @09:39PM (#178799)

    Okay, I thought that Luna did not spin on it's, but just orbited the Earth showing the same hemisphere to us always.

    • (Score: 2) by Fluffeh on Monday May 04 2015, @10:24PM

      by Fluffeh (954) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 04 2015, @10:24PM (#178822) Journal

      Okay, I thought that Luna did not spin on it's, but just orbited the Earth showing the same hemisphere to us always.

      So think about that for a moment, something that orbits another body - yet always has the same side facing it. How could that object NOT be spinning on its own axis? :)

      • (Score: 2) by rts008 on Tuesday May 05 2015, @12:08PM

        by rts008 (3001) on Tuesday May 05 2015, @12:08PM (#179057)

        Yes, I see it now.

        I got myself trapped into thinking soley from a 'bound on earth' perspective.

        Yes, I am just another earth-bound misfit... (apologies to Pink Floyd))

        BTW, thanks for the reply and correction. :-)

        I would much rather be correct in science discussions, than thinking I am 'right'.

    • (Score: 2) by Ryuugami on Tuesday May 05 2015, @12:43AM

      by Ryuugami (2925) on Tuesday May 05 2015, @12:43AM (#178880)

      orbited the Earth showing the same hemisphere to us always

      Yes, but that is because the rotation and revolution are synchronized (the Wikipedia article on tidal locking [wikipedia.org] has some illustrations).

      An experiment:
        - Take your cellphone, turn the camera towards a wall, then spin around with the cellphone in your hand while keeping the camera pointed at the same wall. From your point of view, it will seem like the phone made one full rotation, but the camera is fixed on a single wall - the phone didn't rotate around it's own axis.
        - Next, keep the camera pointed away from you while you spin around, you will always see the same side, so it will seem stationary to you. If you look at the video, though, you will see it made the full circle - the phone rotated around it's own axis.

      --
      If a shit storm's on the horizon, it's good to know far enough ahead you can at least bring along an umbrella. - D.Weber
      • (Score: 2) by rts008 on Tuesday May 05 2015, @11:57AM

        by rts008 (3001) on Tuesday May 05 2015, @11:57AM (#179054)

        LOL! I love the explaination, even though I don't(never have) owned a cell phone. (moot point about cell phone--I understood it)

        Thanks, because I was still trying to wrap my head around it. Now it's so obvious. D'oh!

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 05 2015, @03:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 05 2015, @03:00PM (#179113)

    Or would it be called "lunasynchronous" on the Moon?

    Since "geosynchonous" is derived from the Greek word for earth (geos), not the latin one (terra), I'd also expect the corresponding orbit on the moon to be named after the Greek word (selene), not the Latin word (luna).

    Thus I'd expect the orbit to be called "selenosynchronous".