Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday May 05 2015, @10:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the are-you-good-to-work-with? dept.

Jake Edge writes at LWN.net that there is a myth that programming skill is somehow distributed on a U-shaped curve and that people either "suck at programming" or that they "rock at programming", without leaving any room for those in between. Everyone is either an amazing programmer or "a worthless use of a seat" which doesn't make much sense. If you could measure programming ability somehow, its curve would look like the normal distribution. According to Edge this belief that programming ability fits into a bi-modal distribution is both "dangerous and a myth". "This myth sets up a world where you can only program if you are a rock star or a ninja. It is actively harmful in that is keeping people from learning programming, driving people out of programming, and it is preventing most of the growth and the improvement we'd like to see." If the only options are to be amazing or terrible, it leads people to believe they must be passionate about their career, that they must think about programming every waking moment of their life. If they take their eye off the ball even for a minute, they will slide right from amazing to terrible again leading people to be working crazy hours at work, to be constantly studying programming topics on their own time, and so on.

The truth is that programming isn't a passion or a talent, says Edge, it is just a bunch of skills that can be learned. Programming isn't even one thing, though people talk about it as if it were; it requires all sorts of skills and coding is just a small part of that. Things like design, communication, writing, and debugging are needed. If we embrace this idea that "it's cool to be okay at these skills"—that being average is fine—it will make programming less intimidating for newcomers. If the bar for success is set "at okay, rather than exceptional", the bar seems a lot easier to clear for those new to the community. According to Edge the tech industry is rife with sexism, racism, homophobia, and discrimination and although it is a multi-faceted problem, the talent myth is part of the problem. "In our industry, we recast the talent myth as "the myth of the brilliant asshole", says Jacob Kaplan-Moss. "This is the "10x programmer" who is so good at his job that people have to work with him even though his behavior is toxic. In reality, given the normal distribution, it's likely that these people aren't actually exceptional, but even if you grant that they are, how many developers does a 10x programmer have to drive away before it is a wash?"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 05 2015, @03:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 05 2015, @03:31PM (#179123)

    If you had those soft skills you might realize adults tune you out at "SJW", using that term immediately makes you look like a petulant child. It makes it appear that you're unable to stick to the topic and use any chance you can to bring your pet annoyance into a conversation. It's a fallacy that most people have soft skills, and fairly obvious you don't have them, if it were true there would be little complaint about the management field as a whole, in fact Dilbert is based on just that concept a boss with no technical or social skills and engineers with lots of technical skills but no social skills. The presenter is an accomplished programmer saying that we need to make sure that we're not letting our own stereotypes get in our way, brings up a proof, and then you immediately dismiss it as "SJW". Just because it scares you, doesn't mean it's wrong. You'll just have to up your game to compete, since you obviously are afraid at the prospect of competing with a larger pool, something which someone at the top end of the graph you don't think exists wouldn't be afraid of.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=5
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Tuesday May 05 2015, @04:44PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Tuesday May 05 2015, @04:44PM (#179150)

    Actually, most of the adults I know would not know what that acronym meant, because they're too busy getting the actual real shit done to worry about what extreme groups of loons are saying about each other on the internet.

    I hope to be like them when I grow up.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 05 2015, @08:12PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 05 2015, @08:12PM (#179241)

      An "SJW" is anyone who says anything bad about whites, males, or heterosexuals, or anyone who disagrees about anything with the person using the term.