Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday May 05 2015, @02:58PM   Printer-friendly
from the our-thinking-is-always-fuzzy dept.

I found an article published on Science Daily which reports 'Fuzzy thinking' in depression, bipolar disorder: New research finds effect is real. Here's an excerpt:

People with depression or bipolar disorder often feel their thinking ability has gotten "fuzzy," or less sharp than before their symptoms began. Now, researchers have shown in a very large study that effect is indeed real -- and rooted in brain activity differences that show up on advanced brain scans.

What's more, the results add to the mounting evidence that these conditions both fall on a spectrum of mood disorders, rather than being completely unrelated. That could transform the way doctors and patients think about, diagnose and treat them.

In a new paper in the journal BRAIN, researchers from the University of Michigan Medical School and Depression Center and their colleagues report the results of tests they gave to 612 women -- more than two-thirds of whom had experienced either major depression or bipolar disorder. The researchers also present data from detailed brain scans of 52 of the women, who took tests while brain scans were conducted.

[...] On the brain scans, the researchers found that the women with depression or bipolar disorder had different levels of activity than healthy women in a particular area of the brain called the right posterior parietal cortex. In those with depression, the activity in this area was higher than in healthy individuals, while in those with bipolar disorder it was lower. The area where the differences were seen helps control "executive function" -- activities such as working memory, problem solving and reasoning.

An abstract is available but the full report is behind a paywall.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday May 05 2015, @08:18PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday May 05 2015, @08:18PM (#179246) Journal

    You know, it's this kind of in-depth scientific analysis that keeps me coming back to this site!
     
    First post: personal anecdote from a self-confessed crazy person.
     
    Second Post: It's fake because of a paywall.
     
    Clearly, no more science is necessary w/r/t the human brain. Soylent has it sussed out!
     
    (I kid because I love)

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by melikamp on Wednesday May 06 2015, @12:25AM

    by melikamp (1886) on Wednesday May 06 2015, @12:25AM (#179307) Journal

    You know, it's this kind of in-depth scientific analysis that keeps me coming back to this site! First post: personal anecdote from a self-confessed crazy person. Second Post: It's fake because of a paywall.

    As some of you know, I enjoy this site thoroughly. Which is why it drives me babanas every time there's a news item about a scientific study behind a paywall. Half the time I am incensed because the study looks interesting, and I would actually like to read the study and discuss it, but I cannot. In all fairness, I could probably rig up access for myself using my various affiliations, past and present, but THIS IS BULLSHIT. Most people cannot just "rig it up", and let's just say I am feeling some empathy here (hence the yelling). I think SN would be cooler by boycotting non-free scientific publishers. It should not be a formal boycott, I think, but just a group-think feeling I am trying to create right now with this post. I would never submit a news item about a non-free article, and I would be quite happy if others did the same. All I am saying :)