Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Wednesday May 06 2015, @08:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the for-very-large-values-of-unreasonable dept.

When the United States Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson was asked, "do you believe the government has the right to bulk collection of records from millions of individuals without a warrant", his response was that the question was "beyond my competence as secretary of homeland security" to answer.

The original article touches on some important details and raises key criticisms of the slipshod method currently used to obtain communications records for millions of people from US phone companies in violation of the spirit, if not letter, of the US Constitution's Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable government searches and seizures.

Source video for quotes and context: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_auHdE89qQ

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday May 07 2015, @02:14AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday May 07 2015, @02:14AM (#179744) Journal

    Obama could push to dissolve the Department of Homeland Security or dramatically re-organize it, same as Bush and Cheney pushed to create it. He has not. He could come out strong and say that the reaction to 9/11 has become a greater threat to American freedom than Al Qaeda ever was or ISIS ever will be. He has not.

    He could say those things and introduce legislation to transform his intentions into law and policy, but he does not. Irrespective of whether he could get anything through a Congress controlled by a party that means to thwart him entirely on everything, he could at least fight for the right; he might find millions of people rallying to that cry, and change the national discourse. But he will not.

    That's a much different thing than saying that because Homeland Security and its attendant measures were passed into law before that Obama cannot do anything about them now. He certainly could, but he chooses not to.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by ikanreed on Thursday May 07 2015, @02:39AM

    by ikanreed (3164) Subscriber Badge on Thursday May 07 2015, @02:39AM (#179749) Journal

    A much better complaint.

  • (Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Thursday May 07 2015, @03:11AM

    by PartTimeZombie (4827) on Thursday May 07 2015, @03:11AM (#179753)

    All of which makes me wonder who Obama, (and every other elected official in America) is really ruling for?
    You?
    Did you fund his re-election campaign with tens of millions of dollars?
    No? Then you're not the constituency he's listening to.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Phoenix666 on Thursday May 07 2015, @01:17PM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday May 07 2015, @01:17PM (#179881) Journal

      Of course he isn't. Who is? The usual platitudes people have liked to roll out over the years, eg. "If you don't vote, you can't complain," or "You have to work within the system for change," no longer hold any water when a system becomes so rotten and compromised as this one. How can we know that? It's been demonstrated in front of God, the world, and everybody the last 15 years that no number of Republicans or Democrats will change the status quo, because control of the Whitehouse and Congress have been firmly in Republican, then Democratic hands in that time and nothing happened to avert the destruction of the American middle class or reverse entrenched policies that are so out of step with the times that they have become downright dangerous. It has even been shown that candidates funded by masses of small-dollar donations from ordinary people has no impact on a candidate's loyalties, either; they still represent only the wealthy, entrenched status quo. So, if voting in controlling blocks of Congress and the Whitehouse, and crowd-funding campaigns cannot have any effect on this system, what can?

      When the keepers of the status quo so compromise a system that it can no longer peacefully change, as these entrenched interests have managed here, now, then they are guaranteeing that revolution will occur. At this moment, we're at a place where the illusions the powerful have cultivated to keep the citizenry quiescent have been pierced. Pretense that there is justice has been abandoned--cops are summarily murdering people in the streets, the NSA has blown our Constitution totally away without consequences to any of them, the CIA is torturing people to death without facing the death penalty themselves, Wall Street banks effectively own the government and its regulators, pundits beloved of the mass media have been shown to be liars, and now the highest of government officials are publicly throwing their hands in the air (FEC, Homeland Security) and saying they're not competent. Yes, most people don't pay attention because they're too busy trying to survive, but that has been true since the dawn of time; but the bourgeoisie (as much as I loathe terms with proto-Marxist redolence) are paying attention. Those people are pissed, they're educated, and they are relatively well-armed, with skills & actual weapons.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.