SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Soldiers were selling the U.S. military’s fuel to Afghan locals on the side, and pocketing the proceeds. When Hightower suggested they start doing the same, Charboneau said, she agreed.
In so doing, Charboneau contributed to thefts by U.S. military personnel of at least $15 million worth of fuel since the start of the U.S. war in Afghanistan. And eventually she became one of at least 115 enlisted personnel and military officers convicted since 2005 of committing theft, bribery, and contract rigging crimes valued at $52 million during their deployments in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a comprehensive tally of court records by the Center for Public Integrity.
Many of these crimes grew out of shortcomings in the military’s management of the deployments that experts say are still present: A heavy dependence on cash transactions, a hasty award process for high-value contracts, loose and harried oversight within the ranks, and a regional culture of corruption that proved seductive to the American troops transplanted there.
[Related]: http://www.militarycorruption.com/nguyen.htm
[Also Covered By]: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/05/u_s_troops_have_stolen_tens_of_millions_in_iraq_and_afghanistan_center_for.single.html
Of course, stealing from the military is not strictly limited to overseas. It wasn't that long ago that a single guy was convicted of the largest domestic kickback and bribery scheme at a cool $32.5Million
(Score: 5, Insightful) by MrGuy on Thursday May 07 2015, @03:18PM
The problem with military spending is that it's almost never a "problem" - military spending bills are political anathema to oppose. Arguing for tighter regulation and oversight is arguing for adding "red tape that gets in the way of our troops and puts them in harms way!", so why fight that losing battle?
It's not like these activities actually even harm the troops. Contractors billing for 10 extra people who don't actually exist when building a base? Hey, the base got built. Government getting radically overcharged for basic materials? Hey, you got what you needed - the material is no worse just because we pocketed an extra 20% on the price. Fuel being stolen and sold on the black market? Just order more fuel - as long as there's enough on the base, who cares that we ordered 5 extra tankers we didn't need?
Big military contractors are a small, tight-knit, and very cosy to government group (think Haliburton being lead by Dick Cheney if you want a near-perfect metaphor) - as long as the theft isn't egregious, they have powerful friends and it's unlikely they'll lose out on their cushy no-big contracts. Who's bothering to audit them? And the military itself has a near-bottomless budget in the current climate - if they ask for an extra $100 billion, they get it, and oversight is minimal as long as the report the right numbers in roughly the right place. As long as they keep their heads down when the Inspector General's office comes to town, they're unlikely to get caught.
In short, nobody in a position to change things gives a crap.
(Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Friday May 08 2015, @02:30AM
What's good for M & M Enterprises will be good for the country.