Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday May 08 2015, @10:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the commons-sense dept.

Sara Novak reports that according to a recent study, “badly tuned” cars and trucks make up one quarter of the vehicles on the road, but cause 95 percent of black carbon, also known as soot, 93 percent of carbon monoxide, and 76 percent of volatile organic chemicals like benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes. “The most surprising thing we found was how broad the range of emissions was,” says Greg Evans. “As we looked at the exhaust coming out of individual vehicles, we saw so many variations. How you drive, hard acceleration, age of the vehicle, how the car is maintained – these are things we can influence that can all have an effect on pollution.”

Researchers at the University of Toronto looked at 100,000 cars as they drove past air sampling probes on one of Toronto’s major roads. An automated identification and integration method was applied to high time resolution air pollutant measurements of in-use vehicle emissions performed under real-world conditions at a near-road monitoring station in Toronto, Canada during four seasons, through month-long campaigns in 2013–2014. Based on carbon dioxide measurements, over 100 000 vehicle-related plumes were automatically identified and fuel-based emission factors for nitrogen oxides; carbon monoxide; particle number, black carbon; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX); and methanol were determined for each plume.

Evans and his team found that policy changes need to better target cars that are causing the majority of the air pollution. “The ultrafine particles are particularly troubling,” says Evans. “Because they are over 1,000 times smaller than the width of a human hair, they have a greater ability to penetrate deeper within the lung and travel in the body.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 08 2015, @04:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 08 2015, @04:23PM (#180364)

    "saved myself about $50 a month even not accounting for the cost of owning a car."

    Saved yourself $50/month in opposed to ... walking? Renting a car? Taking a cab? Motorcycle?

  • (Score: 2) by Thexalon on Friday May 08 2015, @04:53PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday May 08 2015, @04:53PM (#180383)

    At the time, I owned a car, so I could have driven it to work. Much of the cost for doing that would have been parking near the office, which was in an urban center, so the calculation was basically parking + gas - bus fare.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.