Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Death to C

posted by CoolHand on Friday May 08 2015, @09:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the off-with-its-head dept.

Teckla writes in with an article promoting "Death to C":

Ladies and gentlemen, the C programming language. It’s a classic. It is blindingly, quicksilver fast, because it’s about as close to the bone of the machine as you can get. It is time-tested and ubiquitous. And it is terrifyingly dangerous.

The author's biggest issue with the C language seems to be security holes:

If you write code in C, you have to be careful not to introduce subtle bugs that can turn into massive security holes — and as anyone who ever wrote software knows, you cannot be perfectly careful all of the time.

The author claims that the Rust language is a modern answer to these issues and should replace C (and C++). It does look that Rust can run C code, so it looks like an interesting proposition. What do Soylent's coders think about this?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Death to C | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 127 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 08 2015, @09:52PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 08 2015, @09:52PM (#180505)

    Guess we should push it aside and all use Rust then.

    BTW when will Rust actually work?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 08 2015, @10:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 08 2015, @10:17PM (#180517)

    Carmack is still alive? What has he done lately?

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 09 2015, @01:00AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 09 2015, @01:00AM (#180587)

      He works for Facebook. [techcrunch.com]