Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Wednesday May 13 2015, @08:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the not-so-open-anymore dept.

Mozilla Firefox 38 has been released. It adds the <picture> element, Ruby annotation support, and Encrypted Media Extensions (EME), a form of digital rights management for HTML5 video. It also automatically downloads Adobe's Primetime Content Decryption Module (CDM) on 32-bit versions of Firefox on Windows Vista and newer Windows systems. The Register reports:

The nonprofit grudgingly agreed to add EME support to Firefox last year, despite the vocal objections of both Mozilla's then-CTO Brendan Eich and the Free Software Foundation. "Nearly everyone who implements DRM says they are forced to do it" the FSF said at the time, "and this lack of accountability is how the practice sustains itself."

Nonetheless, Mozilla promoted Firefox 38 to the Release channel on Tuesday, complete with EME enabled – although it said it's still doing so reluctantly. "We don't believe DRM is a desirable market solution, but it's currently the only way to watch a sought-after segment of content," Mozilla senior veep of legal affairs Danielle Dixon-Thayer said in a blog post.

The first firm to leap at the chance to shovel its DRM into Firefox was Adobe, whose Primetime Content Delivery Module for decoding encrypted content shipped with Firefox 38 on Tuesday. Thayer said various companies, including Netflix, are already evaluating Adobe's tech to see if it meets their requirements. Mozilla says that because Adobe's CDM is proprietary "black box" software, it has made certain to wrap it in a sandbox within Firefox so that its code can't interfere with the rest of the browser. (Maybe that's why it took a year to get it integrated.)

The CDM will issue an alert when it's on a site that uses DRM-wrapped content, so people who don't want to use it will have the option of bowing out. If you don't want your browser tainted by DRM at all, you still have options. You can disable the Adobe Primetime CDM so it never activates. If that's not good enough, there's a menu option in Firefox that lets you opt out of DRM altogether, after which you can delete the Primetime CDM (or any future CDMs from other vendors) from your hard drive. Finally, if you don't want DRM in your browser and you don't want to bother with any of the above, Mozilla has made available a separate download that doesn't include the Primetime CDM and has DRM disabled by default.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by khedoros on Friday May 15 2015, @07:19AM

    by khedoros (2921) on Friday May 15 2015, @07:19AM (#183269)
    I'm aware that some people perceive a difference, but if there's no practical consequence to the difference for me as a developer (rather than for someone else as a lawyer or philosopher), then there's no practical purpose to consider them separate concepts. "Open Source" and "Free Software" advocate for the same end result from different philosophical grounds. They are two angles of the same argument and two camps within the same movement. Ask another expert (Bruce Perens), and he'd agree with my position.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2015, @03:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2015, @03:32AM (#184311)

    Some open source licenses are quite restrictive. Free software licenses guarantee you four fundamental freedoms.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 19 2015, @06:15AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 19 2015, @06:15AM (#184947)

    Ask another expert (Bruce Perens), and he'd agree with my position.

    Sounds like you missed this https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/02/msg01641.html [debian.org]

    ( Perens: It's Time to Talk about Free Software Again )

    • (Score: 2) by khedoros on Thursday May 21 2015, @08:02AM

      by khedoros (2921) on Thursday May 21 2015, @08:02AM (#185937)
      No, I just don't think that it contradicts the point that I was trying to make. They're two aspects of the same thing, with the same eventual goal. "Open Source" is just a way to market software freedom from a more pragmatic angle.