Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday May 14 2015, @11:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the here-comes-the-next-upgrade dept.

Streaming hasn't completely killed the optical disc. The Blu-ray Disc Association has completed the Ultra HD Blu-ray specification. New Ultra HD Blu-ray discs will support 3840×2160 "4K" resolution at up to 60 FPS using H.265/High Efficiency Video Coding. It also supports the larger Rec. 2020 color gamut, which allows for colors of greater saturation to be reproduced. 10-bit per channel color depth is supported, increasing the number of possible colors to ~1.07 billion (10243) from ~16.8 million (2563).

The specification defines discs with capacities of 66 GB and 100 GB. This means that the 33 GB per layer, triple-layer technology of 100 GB BDXL discs will reach consumers.

Tom's Hardware notes:

With a new spec also comes new Ultra HD Blu-ray players, which is a bit of a concern. Fortunately, these new players will have backwards compatibility with Blu-ray discs. However, those who have been using a traditional Blu-ray player for some time will just have to replace it with a model that plays Ultra HD Blu-ray, and those who use the PlayStation 4 or Xbox One for Blu-ray content are stuck unless they want to add another space-hogging box to the living room.

Licensing for Ultra HD Blu-ray begins this summer, but just like 4K content and TVs, it will take some time to see wide adoption. The TVs are already here, but the amount of content needs to increase in order for users to justify the cost of purchasing new 4K devices.

[More After the Break]


ExtremeTech describes an optional "digital bridge" feature (read: DRM) that attempts to allow greater flexibility in how users can view the content:

The new digital bridge feature is designed to give customers more flexibility in how they consume content. In 2015, simply having the content on a disc isn't good enough — not when people are used to watching Netflix on a tablet, then transferring to a different device and picking up where they left off. The digital bridge devices contemplated by the draft documents available online don't appear to be systems that consumers could build themselves. Instead, you'll buy a UHD Blu-ray player from Samsung or Sony that offers this feature as standard. It goes without saying that the platform is heavily locked down.

The entire process of validating a disc for digital bridging and any charges associated with accessing the content will be handled via remote servers; DRM functions will not reside inside the digital bridge export function (DBEF). Digital bridging is going to be standard on all UHD discs but isn't mandatory for Blu-rays (conventional Blu-ray discs can support it or not as they choose).

ExtremeTech is more optimistic about the prospect of current-gen consoles supporting Ultra HD Blu-ray:

The hardware itself isn't really the problem. Even the Xbox 360 and PS3 could likely handle H.265 decoding with proper software optimization, and the eight-core Jaguar CPUs in both modern consoles are robust enough to do the job. The problem is the discs themselves. The multi-layer discs that UHD relies on likely aren't compatible with the Blu-ray players in either machine. Assuming that's true, it's the kind of feature both companies could add when they inevitably overhaul their platforms for a new process node and lower power consumption. It might even be possible to add H.265 decode support to the GPU hardware with AMD's help. Neither company has announced plans to roll out a new console variant as yet, but we'd be surprised if there weren't second-generation Xbox One's and PlayStations on store shelves by Christmas, 2016.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by SrLnclt on Thursday May 14 2015, @12:34PM

    by SrLnclt (1473) on Thursday May 14 2015, @12:34PM (#182873)

    15 years ago if I got an audio CD I would stick it in my computer, rip the contents, and put it on a shelf for several years. I do the same now with DVDs. All my audio and video is on my NAS box or streaming. I still don't even own a device capable of playing Blu-Ray discs. I'm about as interested in Blu-ray as I am in HD-DVD. I doubt this changes anything.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Thursday May 14 2015, @01:34PM

    by TheRaven (270) on Thursday May 14 2015, @01:34PM (#182887) Journal
    When I built my NAS, I bought a BluRay drive for it because the cost difference between a BD-RE and a DVD-RW was only about £20, and I thought I might use it for backups. 25GB is a bit too small to be useful for backups though and I've not even tried putting a video BD in it. I might bother if there were something as simple as dvdbackup (command-line tool that strips off the CSS and dumps the DVD contents as a folder) for BluRay, but it's simply not been worth it.
    --
    sudo mod me up
    • (Score: 2) by khedoros on Friday May 15 2015, @07:50AM

      by khedoros (2921) on Friday May 15 2015, @07:50AM (#183271)
      I've successfully used Makemkv once or twice to rip blu-rays, and it provides a command-line version. There's something that seems "off" about it, though. For instance, every build of the program is time-limited to 60 days, or needs a freely-posted registration code. It seems like a company that's trying to find a way to sell their product, but they aren't sure it can ever be legally sold...but they want to be able to clear out the free versions from the market to prime it for a pay version, when the time comes. Either that, or it's a honeypot, and any site visitor's IP is logged for nefarious use by whoever is actually behind the program ;-)
  • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Thursday May 14 2015, @03:46PM

    by wonkey_monkey (279) on Thursday May 14 2015, @03:46PM (#182952) Homepage

    I doubt this changes anything

    for you, and therefore by extension no-one else?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk