Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday May 15 2015, @09:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the keep-it-secret-keep-it-safe dept.

Steven Aftergood at the Secrecy News blog is reporting that the U.S. is planning to adopt a new government-wide designation for information that is unclassified, yet withheld from the public, replacing "100 different markings for such information [that] existed across the executive branch":

After years of preparation, the executive branch is poised to adopt a government-wide system for designating and safeguarding unclassified information that is to be withheld from public disclosure. The new system of "controlled unclassified information" (CUI) will replace the dozens of improvised control markings used by various agencies that have created confusion and impeded information sharing inside and outside of government. A proposed rule on CUI was published for public comment on May 8 in the Federal Register. While CUI is by definition unclassified, it is nevertheless understood to require protection against public disclosure on the basis of statute, regulation, or agency policy. In many or most cases, the categories of information that qualify as CUI are non-controversial, and include sensitive information related to law enforcement, nuclear security, grand jury proceedings, and so on.

One of the striking features of the new CUI program is that it limits the prevailing autonomy of individual agencies and obliges them to conform to a consistent government-wide standard. "CUI categories and subcategories are the exclusive means of designating CUI throughout the executive branch," the proposed rule states. "Agencies may not control any unclassified information outside of the CUI Program." Nor do agencies get to decide on their own what qualifies as CUI.

"The mere fact that information is designated as CUI has no bearing on determinations pursuant to any law requiring the disclosure of information or permitting disclosure as a matter of discretion," the new proposed rule said. The possibility that CUI information could or should be publicly disclosed on an authorized basis is not precluded. More specifically, a CUI marking in itself does not constitute an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act, the rule said. However, a statutory restriction that justifies designating information as CUI would also likely make it exempt from release under FOIA.

More subtly, noted John P. Fitzpatrick, the director of the Information Security Oversight Office, there is a large mass of material that is neither CUI nor non-CUI– until someone looks at it and makes an assessment. In all such cases (other than voluntary disclosure by an agency), public access would be governed by the provisions and exemptions of the FOIA.

Public comments are due by July 7.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @12:42AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @12:42AM (#183881)

    The "Rule" should be that IF IT AIN'T REQUIRED TO BE CLASSIFIED, THE PUBLIC GETS TO SEE IT.

    No, it shouldn't. Even though I work for the DoD, you should not get to see my SSN. Neither should you get to see my pay stub which tells me how much I pay for my health insurance, or how much I put into my thrift savings plan, among other things. It is none of your business. While I shouldn't need a SIPRNET account to see my pay stub and it doesn't need to be stored in a GSA-approved safe, the access to this info is rightly controlled. If you really think otherwise, then I demand that you respond with your real name, address, SSN, DOB, and a copy of your latest three pay stubs. That is the kind of information we are talking about here.