SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Center for American Progress reports:
Researchers are still trying to figure out what could convince the estimated 40 million smokers in the U.S. to kick the habit for good.
[...] That was the subject of an innovative study that tracked a group of [employees of the CVS drug store chain] who were recruited to participate in an incentive-based cessation program. According to the researchers, who published their results in the New England Journal of Medicine this week, offering smokers varying financial rewards and penalties in exchange for cutting out cigarettes worked better than they expected.
Participants were recruited through CVS and randomly assigned to several different groups. They could choose whether or not they wanted to join their assigned group or drop out of the study.
The control group offered standard counseling with free smoking cessation tools, like nicorette gum. The other groups were divided between "deposit" and "reward" strategies. In the "deposit program", smokers were required to fork over $150. If they successfully quit, they got their deposit back as well as a $650 bonus; if they didn't quit, they lost their $150 for good. In the "reward program", meanwhile, smokers weren't required to make an initial deposit and simply received a $800 reward for quitting.
Smokers were significantly less likely to consent to participate in the deposit program; about 14 percent of people agreed to join it, compared to 90 percent of people who agreed to try for the $800 reward. However, the people who did agree to pay out the $150 deposit upfront were much more successful at quitting.
[...] More than 80 percent of smokers in the largest rewards-based group had not given up cigarettes by the end of the study.
(Score: 2) by sjames on Saturday May 16 2015, @07:59PM
Yes, there are pitfalls when you try to reduce nic levels to 0. It looks like you tried to get to 0 too quickly and perhaps didn't keep any nic on hand to avoid real cigarettes if it didn't work out. You really weren't reducing your intake, you were just vaping more carrier to get the same nic.
At one point, I was doing the same thing, but caught what was happening. I went back up to high nicotine and found that in the end, I was actually using less than before.
As for comparative effects, it's not all that clear that nicotine alone is any worse than caffeine. It can be hard to be sure since an awful lot of studies fail to make the distinction. They will claim to confirm some harmful effect of 'nicotine' but when you read it you see that the route of administration was cigarettes. Many of the cardiovascular effects appear to be from chronic carbon monoxide exposure and fine particulates. Many of the pulmonary effects seem to be tar and particulates.