Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday May 17 2015, @12:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-sky-is-falling dept.

Stephanie Strom writes in the NYT that deadly avian flu viruses have affected more than 33 million turkeys, chickens and ducks since December and while farmers in Asia and elsewhere have had to grapple with avian flu epidemics, farmers in the United States have never confronted a health crisis among livestock like this one. Almost every day brings confirmation by the Agriculture Department that at least another hundred thousand or so birds must be destroyed; some days, the number exceeds several million.

Mounds and mounds of carcasses have piled up in vast barns in the northwestern corner of Iowa, where farmers and officials have been appealing for help to deal with disposal of such a vast number of flocks. Workers wearing masks and protective gear have scrambled to clear the barns, but it is a painstaking process. In these close-knit towns that include many descendants of the area’s original Dutch settlers, some farmers have resorted to burying dead birds in hurriedly dug trenches on their own land, while officials weighed using landfills and mobile incinerators. Federal lawmakers from Iowa called on the Agriculture Department to do more to help farmers with the culling and disposal of birds. The federal agency has made tens of millions of dollars available for assistance, and noted that it is deploying hundreds of staff members, including 85 in Iowa.

Iowa, where one in every five eggs consumed in the country is laid, has been the hardest hit: More than 40 percent of its egg-laying hens are dead or dying. Many are in this region, where barns house up to half a million birds in cages stacked to the rafters. The high density of these egg farms helps to explain why the flu, which can kill 90 percent or more of a flock within 48 hours, is decimating more birds in Iowa than in other states. “It’s important that we get that done fairly soon and we need landfills to be reasonable in terms of the charges they’re assessing and willing to take these birds,” says US Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. “But at some point in time we’ve basically got to get rid of these birds because otherwise we’re going to begin to have some other issues in terms of odor and flies and things of that nature that people are obviously not going to want to deal with.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @01:53AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @01:53AM (#183910)

    Repeat after me: fictional works are not evidence!

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @01:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @01:57AM (#183912)

    Fictional evidence led to the passage of the Meat Inspection Act and the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906

  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Sunday May 17 2015, @04:10AM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Sunday May 17 2015, @04:10AM (#183953)

    Unless we're talking about Skynet. ;)

    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by captain normal on Sunday May 17 2015, @04:52AM

    by captain normal (2205) on Sunday May 17 2015, @04:52AM (#183960)

    Fictional evidence is used every days in courts all over the US. The congresses of the US and all the states pass laws based on fictional evidence. What have you got against fictional evidence?

    --
    Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts"- --Daniel Patrick Moynihan--
  • (Score: 2) by Hartree on Sunday May 17 2015, @05:30AM

    by Hartree (195) on Sunday May 17 2015, @05:30AM (#183965)

    They're usually the most effective evidence. A documentary setting out your position will only be watched by those already converted or that you bamboozle into watching it, like an advertisement before an Epic Fails video on Youtube.

    Get a successful fictional movie or book out that extols your position and not only will you convince large numbers, you'll make a tidy profit when they willingly buy it at Amazon or Netflix (or watch commercials that others bamboozle them into watching).

    • (Score: 2, Informative) by Eunuchswear on Sunday May 17 2015, @08:32AM

      by Eunuchswear (525) on Sunday May 17 2015, @08:32AM (#183989) Journal

      Case in point -- whole masses of AGW deniers seem to think Chrichton's State of Fear was some kind of documentary.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video [youtube.com]
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @09:53AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 17 2015, @09:53AM (#183997)

    Woot?

    fictional works are not evidence!

    Surely, you jest, my dear AC! Of course they are! The very best sort of evidence! Have you heard of:

    The Bible
    The Wealth of Nations
    Robinson Crusoe
    Atlas Shrugged
    9-11 Report
    Reefer Madness

    Very effective fiction! I hear Rubio is going to "write" a book, too!