Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday May 18 2015, @05:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the back-to-horse-and-buggy-we-go dept.

El Reg reports:

The FBI has accused a security researcher of hacking into the entertainment system of a United Airlines plane mid-flight, before causing the aircraft to temporarily fly "sideways".

Infosec bod Chris Roberts allegedly made that audacious claim to Feds' special agent Mark Hurley, who subsequently applied for a search warrant to examine Roberts' seized electronic devices.

Thirteen items, including thumb drives, a MacBook Pro laptop and an iPad Air were confiscated from Roberts on 15 April this year, after the researcher exited a United Airline flight in Syracuse, New York, according to the Feds' affidavit (PDF).

Roberts, who founded One World Labs, has been quizzed twice by the FBI over the course of the past few months.

He apparently told the Feds that he had hacked into the inflight entertainment systems of Airbus and Boeing aircraft roughly 15 to 20 times between 2011 and 2014.

A story from the BBC has a different perspective on the situation:

Prof Alan Woodward from Surrey University told the BBC he found it "difficult to believe" a passenger could access and manipulate flight control systems from a plug socket on an aircraft seat.

"Flight systems are typically kept physically separate, as are any safety critical systems," he said.

"I can imagine only that someone has misunderstood something in the conversation between the researcher and the FBI, someone is exaggerating to make a point, or, it is actually possible and the aircraft manufacturers have some urgent work to do."/blockquote

The researcher in question, Chris Roberts said on twitter, "There's a whole five years of stuff that the affidavit incorrectly compressed into 1 paragraph... lots to untangle".

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Monday May 18 2015, @08:56PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Monday May 18 2015, @08:56PM (#184809) Journal

    Because Swartz is a good example on what motivates prosecutors and modus operandi?

    In this situation it would be willful misinterpretation regarding facts, purpose and exaggeration. Besides the law entanglement likely has no merit. But perhaps the CV will be padded enough to take political office..

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2015, @11:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2015, @11:09PM (#184867)

    Yes, prosecutors generally do try to prosecute those who likely engaged in criminal behavior. That's exactly what society has tasked them with doing.