Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Monday May 18 2015, @09:03PM   Printer-friendly
from the frack-this dept.

Bloomberg reports:

Oil tycoon Harold Hamm told a University of Oklahoma dean last year that he wanted certain scientists there dismissed who were studying links between oil and gas activity and the state's nearly 400-fold increase in earthquakes, according to the dean's e-mail recounting the conversation.

Hamm, the billionaire founder and chief executive officer of Oklahoma City-based Continental Resources, is a major donor to the university, which is the home of the Oklahoma Geological Survey. He has vigorously disputed the notion that he tried to pressure the survey's scientists. "I'm very approachable, and don't think I'm intimidating," Hamm was quoted as saying in an interview with EnergyWire, an industry publication, that was published on May 11. "I don't try to push anybody around."

Yet an e-mail obtained from the university by Bloomberg News via a public records request says Hamm used a blunt approach during a 90-minute meeting last year with the dean whose department includes the geological survey.

"Mr. Hamm is very upset at some of the earthquake reporting to the point that he would like to see select OGS staff dismissed," wrote Larry Grillot, the dean of the university's Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy, in a July 16, 2014, e-mail to colleagues at the university. Hamm also expressed an interest in joining a search committee charged with finding a new director for the geological survey, according to Grillot's e-mail. And, the dean wrote, Hamm indicated that he would be "visiting with Governor [Mary] Fallin on the topic of moving the OGS out of the University of Oklahoma."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by rts008 on Monday May 18 2015, @10:54PM

    by rts008 (3001) on Monday May 18 2015, @10:54PM (#184864)

    You will have to stay confused. This is not about whether you are angry or not, and if you can't figure out if you are angry or not, why should we decide for you, or even care?

    Take a breath now. I would hate to see you suffocate just because someone did not tell you recently to breathe. ;-)

    It is about an extortion attempt by a specific oil interest against university scientists and their research. "Quit telling the truth and making me look like a greedy bastard, or I won't give you any more money for research we have benefited from, and give it to someone else." is what he is saying, as is his right to choose where he spends his money, or even IF he spends his money for research.

    If you get angry about it, or don't, I could not care less. I do care about how I feel about this, but that is a different subject.

    I 'have a dog in this fight' as they say here in central Oklahoma, and I see and feel the effects of the wastewater injections and fracking induced quakes, and I have watched them slowly tear this old house apart the past 5-6 years. Friends and acquaintances lighting their tap water, and flammable water seeping up from the ground and pooling, are increasingly common events the past several years. All this stuff is new, and a bit scary for a lot of us here, and not right.

    So I can see why this scumbag wants to shut the scientists up.

    Good luck to him finding a accredited state university that will play by his rules here in OK(surprisingly), as OSU(Oklahoma State University) has been doing the same type studies, finding similar results, and publishing them for a couple of years now.(even with Boone Pickens as the OSU sugar daddy)

    So my advice to you, is for you to go figure out if you are angry about it, and why, then come back for discussion...or not.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2015, @11:53PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 18 2015, @11:53PM (#184881)

    I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!