Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Thursday May 21 2015, @04:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the nothing-to-be-ashamed-of dept.

Wired:

A woman at a gym tells her friend she pays rent higher than $2,000 a month. An ex-Microsoft employee describes his work as an artist to a woman he's interviewing to be his assistant—he makes paintings and body casts, as well as something to do with infrared light that's hard to discern from his foreign accent. Another man describes his gay lover's unusual sexual fetish, which involves engaging in fake fistfights, "like we were doing a scene from Batman Returns."

These conversations—apparently real ones, whose participants had no knowledge an eavesdropper might be listening—were recorded and published by the NSA. Well, actually no, not the NSA, but an anonymous group of anti-NSA protestors claiming to be contractors of the intelligence agency and launching a new "pilot program" in New York City on its behalf. That spoof of a pilot program, as the prankster provocateurs describe and document it in videos on their website, involves planting micro-cassette recorders under tables and benches around New York city, retrieving the tapes and embedding the resulting audio on their website: Wearealwayslistening.com.

Could actions like these, while they will surely be dismissed as childish stunts by some, succeed at driving home the real impact of NSA spying to the general public in a way that hasn't been managed yet?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21 2015, @03:54PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21 2015, @03:54PM (#186052)

    There is no expectation of privacy in a public space.

    This is false. For instance, you generally can't stick a camera under someone's skirt and take a picture; not even in a public place. Furthermore, we should have privacy from mass surveillance. Even in public places. This is because mass surveillance is far different from people just seeing you or overhearing you, for obvious reasons.

    Please don't repeat this "expectation of privacy" nonsense any longer; it plays right into the hands of authoritarians who want to enable mass surveillance.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21 2015, @05:09PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 21 2015, @05:09PM (#186093)

    For instance, you generally can't stick a camera under someone's skirt and take a picture; not even in a public place

    Sure you can! [ibtimes.com] We should automate this and upskirt everyone, all the time.