Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Thursday May 21 2015, @12:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the bill-them-later dept.

The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is asking a federal court to penalize PayPal for "illegally signing up and billing tens of thousands of consumers for its online credit product, PayPal Credit." Under the proposed order, PayPal would return $15 million to customers, pay a fine of $10 million for its actions, and make its PayPal Credit practices more clear:

Since 2008, the company has offered PayPal Credit, formerly called Bill Me Later, which is a financial product that operates like other forms of credit. Consumers make purchases using it as a form of payment and then repay the debt over time. As with credit cards and similar products, consumers using PayPal Credit may incur interest, late fees, and other charges.

From the first encounter a consumer may have had with PayPal Credit, there were problems. Tens of thousands of consumers who were attempting to enroll in a regular PayPal account, or make an online purchase, were signed up for the credit product without realizing it. The company enrolled other consumers while they tried to cancel or close out of the application process. Many people ended up enrolled without knowing how or why, only to discover unexpectedly that they actually had an account when they learned of a credit-report inquiry, or when they received emails welcoming them to PayPal Credit, billing statements, or debt-collection calls.

One reason so many consumers ended up having this product, unbeknownst to them, was that PayPal set the default payment method for all purchases to PayPal Credit. Other consumers were simply not able to select another payment method when they tried to pay.

Then, for those who did willingly sign up for the product, PayPal in many instances failed to honor advertised promotions, such as the promise of a $5 or $10 credit toward consumer purchases. This was deceptive advertising.

Finally, once enrolled, consumers encountered headache after headache. PayPal failed to post payments properly, lost payment checks, and mishandled billing disputes that consumers had with merchants or the company itself. Numerous consumers reported that the company took more than a week to process payment checks. And even when customers were unable to pay because of website failures, they still got charged late fees.

Also at The Register.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by nitehawk214 on Thursday May 21 2015, @03:29PM

    by nitehawk214 (1304) on Thursday May 21 2015, @03:29PM (#186042)

    To be fair, actual banks pull this kind of shit too.

    I once was a bit lax in inspecting my credit card statements for a year and found that Bank of America signed me up for some 3rd party "credit protection service" without my permissions. After an angry email to BoA management and the company involved, I got all of the money returned promptly. It wasn't a lot of money, maybe $10 a month for a year, but it was the fact they tricked me into clicking the wrong box or something that made me furious.

    --
    "Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by khchung on Friday May 22 2015, @02:10AM

    by khchung (457) on Friday May 22 2015, @02:10AM (#186291)

    You got your money returned promptly precisely because BoA *is* a bank, and is thus regulated.

    Paypal can lock up peoples' money whenever they like because they *aren't* regulated as a bank. Your example actually proved the point.