Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday May 22 2015, @03:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the whats-dat-whatsapp dept.

Chechnya's leader Ramzan Kadyrov has urged men to stop their wives from using WhatsApp after anger over a police chief's forced marriage to a 17-year-old spread on the messaging service:

"Lock them in, do not let them go out, then they will not post anything," Ramzan Kadyrov was quoted as saying. Mr Kadyrov had earlier backed a police chief's marriage to a 17-year-old, even though he was already married, in apparent violation of Russian laws. His chief of staff has since proposed legalising polygamy in Chechnya.

Mr Kadyrov, an authoritarian leader and close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, has in recent years outlawed the abduction of brides and underage marriage. He is also thought to be in favour of polygamy. His top aide Magomed Daudov said: "It all has to be in keeping with Sharia: But if a man can support more than one wife, then why not?"

Before Saturday's ceremony, local media reported that police chief Nazhud Guchigov, 47, had prevented Kheda Goylabiyeva from leaving her home and threatened her family with reprisals if they did not hand her over.

Mr Kadyrov denounced discussion of the marriage on WhatsApp in comments broadcast on local state-run TV. "Stop. Behave like Chechens," he was reported as saying. "The family honour is the most important thing. Do not write such things. Men, do take your women out of WhatsApp." Last week he took to his Instagram account to criticise Russian media coverage of the marriage as "this fuss ordered by some liberals". "The girl's parents gave their blessing to this marriage," he claimed, arguing that reports to the contrary were filled with lies.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday May 22 2015, @05:43PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday May 22 2015, @05:43PM (#186556) Homepage

    I'd buy him a beer. He comes from a society that values a strong family and understands the proper place of women in that family.

    Contrast that with American society -- You let women say whatever they want to say and do whatever they want to do and now you're liable for raising another man's kid [huffingtonpost.com] into adulthood, having a woman take at least half your shit in a divorce [businessinsider.com] and sue for alimony for no fucking reason, falsely accuse [utsandiego.com] you of rape [nypost.com] and have you thrown in jail to be raped by big black cocks because you looked at her funny, or because she led you into bed and then needed a good excuse since she was with another man at the time, or...

    Well, you get the idea.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Troll=2, Funny=1, Underrated=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Friday May 22 2015, @05:55PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 22 2015, @05:55PM (#186567)

    In case you didn't know, you get half of her stuff too : ) Better to have a pre-nup.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Friday May 22 2015, @06:07PM

      by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday May 22 2015, @06:07PM (#186575) Journal

      Contrast that with American society -- You let women say whatever they want to say and do whatever they want to do...
       
      Imagine that, the Constitution of the US actually applies to everyone!

      • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 22 2015, @08:07PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 22 2015, @08:07PM (#186641)

        If the constitution is a feminist document, every copy of it should be burned.

        You ignore the fact that men in the USA married 9 yr old girls till feminism happened in the mid to late 1800s.
        But fine.

        If the constitution is a feminist document, every copy of it should be burned.

        I would rather have a little girl as a bride (or 2) than whatever completely useless and abrogated false rights supposedly exist on that parchment.

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by Zinho on Friday May 22 2015, @09:24PM

          by Zinho (759) on Friday May 22 2015, @09:24PM (#186671)

          I was wondering when you were going to show up! Finally, a thread where your comments are on-topic!

          If the constitution is a feminist document, every copy of it should be burned.

          It's not a feminist document, it's a humanist one. We're just adopting a broader definition of "human" than was used in the past. Most Americans these days consider the inclusion of anyone whose species is homo sapiens sapiens under the umbrella of "humanity" to be appropriate. That includes a wide range of skin colors, sexual preferences, and a few genders as well. Sorry if that last one is giving you heartburn.

          --
          "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 22 2015, @11:31PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 22 2015, @11:31PM (#186708)

    > having a woman take at least half your shit in a divorce and sue for alimony for no fucking reason

    Absolutely false. A divorcing spouse is only deserving of 50% of the assets acquired during the marriage. Anything that existed before the marriage is off-limits. But you are right, the reason isn't for fucking, it is for being a partnership where each spouse supports the other in life. That is how partnerships work.