Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Saturday May 23 2015, @06:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the boys-will-be-boys dept.

John Ochsendorf wants to tear down Rome's iconic Pantheon. He wants to pull apart its 2,000-year-old walls until its gorgeous dome collapses. Destroying it, he believes, is the best way to preserve it.

But the Pantheon that Ochsendorf, a professor of engineering and architecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has in mind to destroy is less than 20 inches high, and it's made of 492 3-D-printed blocks. It's designed from laser scans of the real building. A gaggle of MIT engineering students will place it on a table with a sliding base and pull the walls apart, then put it back together and tilt it until it crumbles.

It's hard to see how razing a doll-sized Roman monument will help protect the real thing. But Ochsendorf, whose easy smile and self-effacing humor belie confidence and determination, has a serious goal: to prove that historical structures like the Pantheon are more stable than we give them credit for. "By every measure of success of a building—from an architectural, from an artistic, and from an engineering standpoint—I would argue that the Pantheon is the greatest that was ever built," Ochsendorf says. "There's no greater definition of success for a building than it's been standing for 20 centuries."

It also represents a masterwork of engineering and a repository of ancient technical knowledge—the structural equivalent of the Mona Lisa. Ochsendorf is working to halt what he sees as unnecessary interventions in historical buildings, in which engineers try to fix cracked or slumping walls with steel bars and supports. "We see a crack in a structure and we do a major intervention, but that's akin to dipping the Mona Lisa in epoxy because one section of the painting has faded a bit," he says.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by fritsd on Saturday May 23 2015, @11:20AM

    by fritsd (4586) on Saturday May 23 2015, @11:20AM (#186826) Journal

    When I was there, they had roped off the area under the big hole in the center, because a German tourist was killed by a falling piece of stone a few years before.

    It's a pity, because of the deep significance of constructing a domed temple to the gods, and then leaving open a big hole in the center of the dome for the rain and wind to come in, making the entire structure an interaction between human culture and the natural elements.

    How many other significant buildings are there that have a big hole in the ceiling on purpose? I can't think of any. The St. Peter is closed off at the top (beautiful view!). The Duomo of Florence is closed off at the top.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by BigJ on Saturday May 23 2015, @01:05PM

    by BigJ (3685) on Saturday May 23 2015, @01:05PM (#186854)

    Texas Stadium

    All Hail the Cowboys!!

    • (Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 23 2015, @05:21PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 23 2015, @05:21PM (#186903)

      All Hail the Cowboys!!

      We were talking about big holes, not a-holes.