Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Sunday May 24 2015, @04:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the RTFA dept.

When we hear the word "multiculturalism," some imagine people of all races and creeds holding hands, others imagine a clash of disparate cultures that cannot co-exist. There are many more nuanced definitions in between.

In the world of mainstream politics, there is now widespread acknowledgment that the failure of immigrants to properly integrate into the culture of their host nations is causing a lot more harm that good. The backlash against multiculturalism has begun to manifest itself as a rise of nationalist parties such as England's UKIP and France's National Front gaining more support from disillusioned countrymen.

In 2010 German Chancellor Angela Merkel declared that,

" This [multicultural] approach has failed, utterly failed," Merkel told the meeting in Potsdam, west of Berlin, yesterday. "

Merkel also suggested that the onus was on immigrants to do more to integrate into German society, and late last year the European Court of Justice ruled that EU citizens who move to another member state "solely in order to obtain social assistance" may be excluded from receiving that assistance, an acknowledgement that multiculturalism's side effects are causing more harm than good.

Those interested in this topic should read Foreign Affairs' excellent article The Failure of Multiculturalism.

As a political tool, multiculturalism has functioned as not merely a response to diversity but also a means of constraining it. And that insight reveals a paradox. Multicultural policies accept as a given that societies are diverse, yet they implicitly assume that such diversity ends at the edges of minority communities. They seek to institutionalize diversity by putting people into ethnic and cultural boxes—into a singular, homogeneous Muslim community, for example—and defining their needs and rights accordingly. Such policies, in other words, have helped create the very divisions they were meant to manage.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @06:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @06:11PM (#187234)

    > The problem isn't the dude pulling the trigger or the dude getting hit, but all the cheering from the sidelines and the apologists.

    Why don’t more moderate Muslims denounce extremism? [washingtonpost.com]

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @09:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @09:21PM (#187349)

    That anecdotal experience by one journalist is counter to the polls around the western world that show apathy to outright support for this sort of behavior by islamic communities.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @09:31PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @09:31PM (#187355)

      That anecdotal experience by one journalist is counter to the polls around the western world that show apathy to outright support for this sort of behavior by islamic communities.

      (1) You don't seem to understand the definition of "anecdotal."
      (2) Also, false: Muslims Americans more likely than other faith groups to reject attacks on civilians [gallup.com]

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @01:21AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @01:21AM (#187443)

        1. You obviously don't understand the definition of anecdotal nor how to make a point. He has individual experiences that he is using for generalizations and you just believe it blindly while denouncing anyone pointing out the complete lack of reason.
        2. Also, my point is true: and my source has many polls proving my point [chersonandmolschky.com] while yours is one poll that is only tangentially related.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @01:47AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @01:47AM (#187452)

          > He has individual experiences that he is using for generalizations

          He is a reporter, reporting on facts.

          > and my source has many polls proving my point while yours is one poll that is only tangentially related.

          (1) You don't seem to understand the definition of "tangential."
          (2) Not even close. For one thing "23 countries across Southeastern Europe, Asia, North Africa and the Middle East" is literally not the western world and for another belief in sharia is no more support for extremism than keeping kosher and obeying the talmud is.

          You really suck at definitions. Srsly. Stop using words you don't understand.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @11:33PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 24 2015, @11:33PM (#187406)
      The denouncement of the attacks is fact. Your claim about the polls isn't.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @01:17AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @01:17AM (#187441)

        Make up things all you want the truth remains the same.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @02:30AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @02:30AM (#187472)
          The denouncements are verified. The polls, even if they exist, are not a statement of fact. Your reply doesn't belong where it landed.