Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday May 25 2015, @01:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the changed-research-climate-changes-climate-research dept.

Scientists used the Medea program to study how global warming could worsen conflict. Now that project has come to an end.

Some national security experts were surprised to learn that an important component of that effort has been ended. A CIA spokesperson confirmed to Climate Desk that the agency is shuttering its main climate research program. Under the program, known as Medea, the CIA had allowed civilian scientists to access classified data—such as ocean temperature and tidal readings gathered by Navy submarines and topography data collected by spy satellites—in an effort to glean insights about how global warming could create security threats around the world.In theory, the program benefited both sides: Scientists could study environmental data that was much higher-resolution than they would normally have access to, and the CIA received research insights about climate-related threats.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/05/cia-closing-its-main-climate-research-program

[Medea: Measurements of Earth Data for Environmental Analysis. - Ed]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by K_benzoate on Monday May 25 2015, @09:53PM

    by K_benzoate (5036) on Monday May 25 2015, @09:53PM (#187749)

    A better way to measure success is to consider what we've been able to accomplish with the given resources, and compare those outcomes to what could have been achieved with a maximally efficient effort. Squandering billions of dollars to listen in on everyone's phone calls, drill students through weeks of standardized testing, or allow superfluous rent-seekers to parasitise our healthcare system, are not maximally efficient ways to organize a modern human society. In fact, it's worse than that. Devoting man-hours and treasure to these pursuits isn't just an opportunity cost, it's actually setting back progress in other areas. These activities provide negative utility across the domain of civilization. They persist because, like the war of all against all in our recent past, they've found local optimums--islands of stability within a chaotic system.

    So while you're right that I haven't been waylaid by marauders at any time in my life, I still can't get medical care without going broke, my kids likely won't be able to afford an education without going in to debt (if at all), and my country locks up more of its own people per capita than any other significant* nation on Earth--many for victimless horticultural activities. And back when highwaymen and footpads were things to worry about, there were a slew of social problems and difficulties which were within the civilizations of the periods' capacities to solve but which they failed to overcome due to their own shortcomings. And it's not as if they were simply unaware of the problems or their ability to fix them; moral exemplars of the time noticed and wrote about them, in an effort to inform their society and spur it to do better.

    It's perfectly valid to comment on our relative shortcomings without committing the fallacy of historically relative privation. [wikipedia.org]

    *Seychelles technically has a higher rate of 868 prisoners per 100,000 citizens, but their population is only 92,000.

    --
    Climate change is real and primarily caused by human activity.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @10:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 25 2015, @10:37PM (#187764)

    Great response.

    Someone always spits out some obtuse [insert truism here] response which succors pitty and in its own context sounds good, however, holds no real value to the argument.
    You hit the nail exactly on the head with Fallacy of relative privation which can also be coined, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_terminating_cliche [wikipedia.org]