SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The European Union's interoperability page reports:
Using open source in school greatly reduces the time needed to troubleshoot PCs, [as indicated by] the case of the Colegio Agustinos de León (Augustinian College of León, Spain). In 2013, the school switched to using Ubuntu Linux for its desktop PCs in [classrooms] and offices. For teachers and staff, the amount of technical issues decreased by 63 per cent and in the school's computer labs by 90 per cent, says Fernando Lanero, computer science teacher and head of the school's IT department.
[...] "One year after we changed PC operating system, I have objective data on Ubuntu Linux", Lanero tells Muy Linux [English Translation], a Spanish Linux news site. By switching to Linux, incidents such as computer viruses, system degradation, and many diverse technical issues disappeared instantly.
The change also helps the school save money, he adds. Not having to purchase [licenses] for proprietary operating systems, office suites, and anti-virus tools has already saved about €35,000 in the 2014-2015 school year, Lanero says. "Obviously it is much more interesting to invest that money in education."
[...] The biggest hurdle for the IT department was the use of electronic whiteboards. The school uses 30 of such whiteboards, and their manufacturer [Hitachi] does not support the use of Linux. Lanero got the Spanish Linux community involved, and "after their hard work, Ubuntu Linux now includes support for the whiteboards, so now everything is working as it should".
[...] Issues [with proprietary document formats] were temporarily resolved by using a cloud-based proprietary office solution, says Lanero, giving the IT department time to complete the switch to open standards-based office solutions. The school now mostly uses the LibreOffice suite of office tools.
[...] "Across the country, schools have contacted me to hear about the performance and learn how to undertake similar migrations."
As I always say, simply avoid manufacturers with lousy support and FOSS is just the ticket.
[Editor's Comment: Original Submission]
(Score: 5, Insightful) by bradley13 on Tuesday May 26 2015, @12:57PM
I'm a huge FOSS fan. I manage to stick 99% to Linux/LibreOffice, even though my employer runs a Windows network. However, honesty forces me to admit that FOSS software has three problems:
- FOSS is generally less capable that proprietary software. Photoshop vs. Gimp. LibreOffice-Impress vs. PowerPoint.
- FOSS documentation sucks.
- Interoperability. While you can put this on whichever side you care to (proprietary lock-in is the big lever for established players), it is a problem. I can read/write .doc and .xls with no problem, but as soon as someone comes with OOXML formats, interoperability goes down the toilet.
The problems are inevitable: people get paid for writing and documenting proprietary software. There's a lot less money for FOSS, and people gotta eat, it's that simple.
So, while it's great that this works for these Spanish schools, it only works because a few core people have worked their buns off to make it so. Like driving the Linux support for the whiteboards, and probably a hundred other, smaller problems. All of us who install and support FOSS systems know the kinds of weird problems that crop up, and usually there is no support organization you can turn to for help.
I'm rambling here, but that latter ought to be different. People think FOSS means "free as in beer". If more people were willing to pay for support, we could have a much healthier infrastructure. However, that's just not the mentality, so FOSS muddles along on the fringe of relevance, just as is has done for decades now.
Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @01:40PM
FOSS has better documentation than any MS software. If you can't find what you need using "man" just do a google search.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday May 26 2015, @02:04PM
"man" ... Bwahahahahahahah. Oh, boy thanks for that. I need a good laugh.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @02:19PM
Well, it does require an IQ above 10 to understand it.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday May 26 2015, @03:03PM
*Fail Horn*
Nice try. Next time a newbie tries to learn how to use FOSS and rage quits because some jackass tells them to use man, I'll remember your little jab and have a snicker. A newbie will not be able to properly glean anything from man unless that man page is very verbose which they often arent (ntfsclone is one of the more straightforward man pages). This is why a search engine is the newbies friend because there is a wealth of verbose information with the steps and commands laid out in plain english (or whatever your language of choice is). man is akin to a service manual for the experienced technician, not a getting started guide for the customer.
(Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:01PM
Actually, way back in the before time, I did learn to use Unix largely from reading man pages.
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:12PM
Remember, you did. Everyone learns differently.
(Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:29PM
Yes, I did, therefor it can be done. I'm not claiming it's the best way for everyone, just refuting your claim that it can't happen./
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Tuesday May 26 2015, @05:00PM
Fair enough.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:36PM
Secretaries used to use vi-like editors and were comfortable with LaTeX. Now, somehow we pander to the lowest common denominator. People like him will tell you that it's too hard for people like secretaries to run. I don't think people have gotten dumber. I think Windows treats you like you are a dumbass and people like him accept it as fact.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @10:25PM
I have a severe non-verbal learning disability. To me, man pages are the worst shit I've ever come across - little more than wall of text notes to people who already know how something works, as a reminder of how it works.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:35PM
Wow, what an idiot.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by SDRefugee on Tuesday May 26 2015, @03:46PM
Agree... I'm a retired tech, supported windows since WFWG, been a big fan of Linux since 1994 or so, and now that I'm retired, I've pretty much given up on Windows, and run Linux on all my home machines. (Disclaimer: Am trying out Windows 10 preview as I'm *sure* I'm gonna be asked about it once it goes live...) My BIG gripe about Linux man pages are the fact that the vast majority of them are simply a list of the command line switches the program responds to... Which is just peachy if you use the program all the time and you've just forgotten one or more obscure, not-frequently used switches.. But.. say you've NEVER used the program before, you'd REALLY like a few choice *examples* of the invocation/use of the app... Not very many man pages have these, so your only course of action is to google for a tutorial on said app..... That being said, as far as I'm concerned, Linux trumps Windows hands-down....
America should be proud of Edward Snowden, the hero, whether they know it or not..
(Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday May 26 2015, @05:55PM
Not very many man pages have these, so your only course of action is to google for a tutorial on said app.
Not all man pages are wonderful, and I'm sure most would welcome any contributions in editing. However, man pages really are there mostly to be reference tomes, to exhaustively list every command-line option available. For command-line programs, they're extremely useful that way. However, now that we have the internet, there's no shortage of tutorials for various things online, and in fact for any GUI program you certainly would not want a man-page tutorial, you'd want a webpage tutorial so you can see screenshots.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:39PM
In the same comment, the insightful AC mentioned going online to get help.
I visit the forums of several distros fairly regularly.
It's rare that I see a problem that the assembled masses can't solve|hasn't solved.
Indeed, I an often irritated that the poster of the question didn't follow directions and search to find 1 of the dozens of times his question has already been asked and answered.
In addition, a bootable ISO makes it possible to get online--even if you have completely torched your Linux install.
Contrary to any claims that answers to Linux problems are difficult to find, I say that they are no more problematic and are often easier to solve than the payware OS that is usually held up as "the standard".
-- gewg_
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:15PM
I missed where you had re-inserted the brand up in the text.
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by turgid on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:01PM
gnu info
I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent [wikipedia.org].
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @10:30PM
The GNU info pages I've come across remind me of two things. The first is the man page, because all the ones I've come across are a cut-and-paste of the man pages, and the second is this XKCD comic [xkcd.com].
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @03:56PM
I've not seen a single GNU info documentation that was just a cut-and-paste of the man page (actually I've seen it the other way round, the man page being generated from a section(!) of the info file).
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday May 27 2015, @03:50PM
I find GNU info pages completely useless. The navigation mechanisms are too unintuitive, and too different from everything I use regularly, even though I'm an emacs user.
Perhaps automatic mechanisms to view GNU info pages in a mouse-based point-and-click browser could work. Anyone know of such a thing? Maybe a firefos or chrome extension?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @04:00PM
http://math-www.uni-paderborn.de/~axel/tkinfo/ [uni-paderborn.de]
(Score: 1) by turgid on Wednesday May 27 2015, @07:16PM
That was what passes for humour where I come from.
I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent [wikipedia.org].
(Score: 2) by bart9h on Tuesday May 26 2015, @01:41PM
it only works because a few core people have worked their buns off to make it so. Like driving the Linux support for the whiteboards, and probably a hundred other, smaller problems.
And how is that a problem?
If more people were willing to pay for support, we could have a much healthier infrastructure.
Yep, just imagine people donated 10% of what they would pay for proprietary software to the free software projects.
(Score: 5, Informative) by Marand on Tuesday May 26 2015, @01:42PM
- FOSS is generally less capable that proprietary software. Photoshop vs. Gimp. LibreOffice-Impress vs. PowerPoint.
I can't speak for Impress vs. Powerpoint, and I'm not interested in discussing the rest of your comment, but I'm going to rant a bit about the Photoshop vs. Gimp comment, because it's so outdated it's not even funny. Everyone still acts like Gimp is the only open source graphics program, and that hasn't been true for a long time. In fact, it hasn't been the best FOSS graphics tool for years, because it's long since been surpassed for nearly every task by other FOSS options.
The open-source graphics powerhouse has been Krita [krita.org] for a few years now, with no sign of it changing any time soon. Functionality-wise, it's somewhere between Photoshop and a more painting-oriented program like Corel Painter. Depending on what you use Photoshop for, it's your best option for an FOSS-replacement, and for some workflows it even surpasses it.
It handles high bit depth images, non-RGB colour spaces, has non-destructive layer filters and transforms, GPU-accelerated canvas, has a bunch of different brush engines that are insanely configurable, and so much more that it would take far too long to write it all out, with more being added constantly. Just about any "Gimp doesn't have this, it sucks" you can think of will be in Krita. Also, it's Qt, rather than being stuck on gtk2 like gimp, so the UI is less flaky, more configurable, and also works better in Windows.
The OS X support is lacklustre, but that's about the only failing I can think of vs gimp. Krita's easily on par with paid graphics software. In fact, they put a special variant -- which has a switchable tablet+desktop UI -- on Steam with a price tag, and people actually do pay for it. Not only that, but they did a Kickstarter last year that got enough support to fund a developer for a year, and they're doing another one [kickstarter.com] that met its goal before the first week was over. (Which still has about a week left to make stretch goals, if anyone's interested in supporting)
Of course, there are plenty more tools beyond those, depending on need. Blender is insanely polished and powerful; Inkscape is a great tool for vector work; Synfig is available for animation; and MyPaint is a nice painting/sketching oriented app that has an infinite canvas and a decent brush engine.
Seriously, try something other than Gimp, it hasn't been worthy of being considered the FOSS flagship graphics tool in a very long time. It hasn't had enough developer interest in a while, and it's been crippled by its reliance on gtk2 for almost as long. I hope that if I and others rant about this enough, people will finally start to notice and try something good instead of acting like gimp is the entirety of FOSS graphics software.
(Score: 2) by mtrycz on Tuesday May 26 2015, @02:55PM
People that do painting, probably already know about the FOSS options (and mostly don't care, as it's as free-as-in-beer as a pirated photoshop).
Poeple that do photography, where gimp is the major competitor with photoshop, are actually stuck with photoshop. Source: i do some photography.
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @10:33PM
You miss-spelled "anecdotal" there.
(Score: 2) by mtrycz on Wednesday May 27 2015, @08:17AM
Yup. As in: I know from experience, but that's just my experience. Isn't that a sufficient disclaimer?
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 2) by Marand on Wednesday May 27 2015, @04:00AM
People that do painting, probably already know about the FOSS options (and mostly don't care, as it's as free-as-in-beer as a pirated photoshop).
That's bullshit right there. That's sort of like arguing that jobs are a waste of time because "people that need money probably know about employment options, and mostly don't care because robbing a bank is more useful for them."
Plus there are better proprietary painting apps than Photoshop, so if you're going to pirate, at least pirate the right tool for the right job.
Poeple that do photography, where gimp is the major competitor with photoshop, are actually stuck with photoshop. Source: i do some photography.
For most photography uses I've found digikam* to be more than good enough, with the added bonus of having tagging and other organisational features on top. Between that and opening the file in krita I haven't needed gimp for photos in a while. Digikam for sorting, tagging, and basic edits that don't need the weight of Krita (basically anything but touch-up stuff), and then Krita (which has RAW support) if it needs something more involved.
I'm not saying that will work for everybody, of course, but that wasn't my original point. My original point is that nobody even tries, they just use "gimp vs photoshop" as a quick way to dismiss FOSS graphics apps as a whole. Sometimes out of ignorance, sometimes trolling, but it needs to be fought either way.
* Actually, I should have mentioned digikam in my original post, because it's another really nice program that deserves more attention. Good FOSS photo management are really hard to find and it's probably the best one I've found.
(Score: 2) by mtrycz on Wednesday May 27 2015, @08:23AM
DIgicam is for organizing, much like Lightroom from Adobe, not for editing. Last time I tried Krita, it was no good for photoediting, I might as well give it a try sometime.
The only problem I have with Gimp for photoediting is non destructive editing / adjustment layers. There's just no game. Anyway, now that I finished studies, might as well contribute to some of the softwares I use, instead of complaining, eh?
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Marand on Wednesday May 27 2015, @09:34AM
DIgicam is for organizing, much like Lightroom from Adobe, not for editing
I'm aware, but it also has a built-in editor, called ShowFoto, that covers a lot of the basics (like levels, curves, some various transformations) without needing to pull out something heavier. A lot of the time, that really is all one needs, and it acts as a good starting point for firing up something else when you need more.
Unrelated, but I wouldn't be surprised if a really casual user could manage without ever needing a proper editor at all. KDE's viewer, gwenview, has the most common stuff like cropping, resizing, and rotation. Some people might never need more than that. Kind of interesting to consider.
Last time I tried Krita, it was no good for photoediting, I might as well give it a try sometime.
The only problem I have with Gimp for photoediting is non destructive editing / adjustment layers. There's just no game.
Krita's actually been doing a lot with non destructive editing the past few versions. It's recently added transform masks (non-destructive transforms) and has had filter masks (same for filters) for a while. Transforms are pretty obvious, and some of the filters are obvious because they're standard things like blur and sharpen, but it also has "filters" that let you non-destructively change colour, saturation, contrast, brightness, and one (that I love) will convert a colour to alpha.
It's still painting first and foremost, as a design decision, but it has enough feature overlap with Gimp (plus extra things that Gimp can't do) that I can usually use Krita instead, even for general image manipulation. Which is good, because it gets really annoying using it without a working mousewheel (bug I mentioned in another comment).
I still like gimp well enough, and in fact I prefer its multi-window mode to the more common MDI or tabbed designs. It's just been stagnant while others have continued to improve, so it's not quite the shining star it used to be. At this rate, the painting program (Krita) will gain photo editing feature parity with Gimp before Gimp manages to get proper support for something other than 8bit RGB.
Anyway, now that I finished studies, might as well contribute to some of the softwares I use, instead of complaining, eh?
Hey, don't knock it. Sometimes complaining to the right people is contributing. At least, that's what I tell myself when I put in feature requests. :)
(Score: 3, Informative) by danomac on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:00PM
I just thought I'd point out they aren't stuck on gtk2... gtk is an acronym for the GIMP Toolkit, it was written specifically for GIMP.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Marand on Wednesday May 27 2015, @03:36AM
I just thought I'd point out they aren't stuck on gtk2... gtk is an acronym for the GIMP Toolkit, it was written specifically for GIMP.
Yes, I'm aware of gtk's history, possibly better than you are -- gtk+ got the "KFC" treatment and hasn't been "the gimp toolkit" in many, many years[1] -- but you apparently didn't notice that I said gtk2 specifically. I also didn't say they were stuck on gtk, I said that the reliance on gtk2 is crippling it. First release of gtk3 was early 2011, four years ago, and there's still no support, much like the long-promised full GEGL support. At this rate, by the time gtk3 support comes everyone else will be using gtk4.
While in theory there's nothing wrong with using a project that's in maintenance mode like that, it's a problem with gtk2, because it has a lot of odd problems that will likely never be fixed because testing and development has long since moved on to gtk3. It has problems with non-wacom input devices, for example, because it's a market that exploded around gtk3's release.
Another example: the odd way gtk2 handles input devices also causes its share of problems that don't occur in gtk3 because of design improvements in 3 vs 2. With the last two mouses I've owned, I haven't been able to use the mousewheel at all in gimp as a side effect of this. It may be related to having a non-wacom pen display, but it's not a problem with gtk3. It's annoying enough that I've completely stopped using gimp if there's any way to do something in one of the other programs available, at least until the gtk3 port finally surfaces.
Due to the heavy investment in gtk, it makes sense to stick with it, but sticking with gtk2 realy hurts it right now. Not just because long-standing design problems will never improve, but also because the vast majority of gtk devs use and know gtk3 now, so the developer pool is constantly dwindling.
Meanwhile, Krita's managing to pump out new features while still working on the Qt5 port on the side. If Gimp had enough developer interest to do the same, most of my comment probably wouldn't even have been necessary. It's unfortunate, but projects can stagnate, and Gimp has long been showing signs of it.
---
[1] Brief history lesson: the last gtk to be the "gimp toolkit" was the gtk1 series. By gtk2 (in 2002) it had already been rewritten and renamed to "gtk+", with development focused on more than just the needs of gimp. In fact, I looked it up and the rewrite and name-change in 1999 when gtk+ 1.2 was released. So, it hasn't been the "gimp toolkit" for 16 years; I think it's time to get over it and just go with "gtk+" like the rest of the world.
Too bad we don't have some kind of 0-score "Outdated" mod (like Disagree is) for when people post ancient information. You don't deserve a downmod but there should be some way to flag old info.
(Score: 1) by stormreaver on Tuesday May 26 2015, @09:29PM
The open-source graphics powerhouse has been Krita [krita.org] for a few years now, with no sign of it changing any time soon.
The last time I tried Krita, a few years ago, it had one major show-stopping problem: it was unbearably slow. I had several large images I wanted to touch-up. I started Krita, selected the first picture to load, and waited. And waited. And waited.
After getting tired of waiting on that first image, I loaded the first picture in the GIMP, did the touch-ups, and saved it. I checked on Krita, and it was still loading. I loaded the second picture into the GIMP, did the touch-ups, then saved. Krita was still loading. I repeated that for several more pictures in the GIMP, then Krita finally finished loading the first picture.
Krita has great potential, but was so slow that it was unusable. It's been a couple years, though, and I had all but forgotten it still exists.
(Score: 2) by Marand on Wednesday May 27 2015, @04:39AM
The last time I tried Krita, a few years ago, it had one major show-stopping problem: it was unbearably slow. I had several large images I wanted to touch-up. I started Krita, selected the first picture to load, and waited. And waited. And waited.
Not surprising. I've been following it for a long time, and the Qt4 port started out really rocky. The 2.4 release (in early 2012) was when it really started to shine, and anything before that was basically unusable. They've been doing somewhat regular updates since, and speed-ups have been a major focus.
I don't know how large you're talking, but currently even 600dpi images with dozens of layers (using 80+mb of disk space) open pretty well -- well for not being stored on SSD, at least. Canvas interaction used to be slow at large sizes too, but it's had OpenGL acceleration for the canvas for a long time, which helped tremendously. That's around when I really started using it instead of just checking it out occasionally to see progress.
On my (crappy dual core) system it can still be rough using certain brushes or layer operations on 600dpi images -- though it's better than it was at that, too -- but everything else is pretty fast. Performance boosts for large brushes on large canvases seems to be a major theme with the current Kickstarter, so I'm looking forward to seeing that improve more.
That's what I meant before: Gimp's moving at a snail's pace while Krita's been evolving rapidly since 2.4 and other projects have likewise grown quickly. The landscape's completely different but nobody seems to have noticed yet. It's a good time to grab some of the alternatives and poke at them a bit to see what works for you.
(Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @02:48PM
I'm sorry, but that's cherry picking. There are plenty of FLOSS software that is either on equal footing, or better than the proprietary alternatives. Examples of that are Linux, nginx, PostgreSQL, Blender, Firefox, VLC, Eclipse, Octave, Deluge, etc, etc...
Oh and special mention goes to Emacs which completely crushes Windows, OSX, GNU/*, and *BSD in all regards except the text editing business.
(Score: 1) by archshade on Tuesday May 26 2015, @03:31PM
Oh and special mention goes to Emacs which completely crushes Windows, OSX, GNU/*, and *BSD in all regards except the text editing business.
-- Emphasis mine
Err just to nitpick but Emacs was originally written by Richard Stallman. The Same Richard Stall man who started GNU, the FSF, and wrote the GPL. RMS even changed the name of his EMACS to GNU/EMACS to show it was part of the GNU project. Clearly Emacs is an alternative GNU userland. Now GNU just need an editor and it will be sorted (and maybe a finnished kernel).
(Score: 2, Funny) by archshade on Tuesday May 26 2015, @03:36PM
GNU needs a finished kernel (looks at GNU Hurd). There already exists a usable "Finnished" kernel and I here it is quite popular.
(Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday May 27 2015, @04:06PM
Emacs is a perfect tool for the environment it originally flourished on -- a text-only user-interface for those old text-only full-duplex terminals. That's why it has so very many tools -- it's not a text editor, it's a user-friendly operating system for limited-functionality terminal equipment. Of course, it can edit text, that's one of the things computer users need to do now and then.
(Score: 4, Informative) by Thexalon on Tuesday May 26 2015, @02:54PM
LibreOffice has been able to handle reading OOXML formats fairly well for quite some time, and the only problems I've had writing to those formats had to do with using weird stuff that isn't actually part of any documented standard. The main reason LibreOffice has a hard time with them is precisely because Microsoft does everything it can to try to prevent competitors from remaining interoperable.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Tuesday May 26 2015, @03:30PM
Which is why everything must be done to dissuade people from using them. (And anyone involved in ratifying the ill-defined (crap like "this block is a binary stream of data which should be interpreted the same way as it would by one of our prorietory ActiveX controls in Word 2000") "standard" at ISO should have their heads on a chopping block.)
Oh, people are willing to pay for support. My wage for the last decade has been because of companies willing to pay for open source software.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by sjames on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:27PM
Really, FOSS tends to have different capabilities rather than less.
Funny thing about proprietary formats. I have on many occasions rescued some corrupted proprietary file on Windows by loading it into Free software and then writing it back out again. In other words, the FOSS was more compatible with the proprietary format than the MS program,, that created it.
(Score: 3, Informative) by q.kontinuum on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:36PM
This is wrong on so many levels,...
I work in the area of test-automation. If you ever tried to get that started with Windows, and then were allowed to switch to Linux (or e.g. BSD), you wouldn't talk about proprietary software being more capable. Windows is *such* a pain in the ass in that area. It starts with the path-length limitations. If you work with Jenkins, especially with Matrix-jobs and descriptive labels/job names you will easily exceed the maximum allowed path lengths. Can you show me a decent proprietary source-control-system? Feature- and performance-wise comparable to git, especially in combination with gerrit? Or a CI-System feature-wise comparable to Jenkins? Don't tell me Bamboo or Go. They don't come close.
Compared to what? Windows error-messages? "ERROR 9fewui99wq908eqww occured"? Just sticking with Jenkins as an example, I get full documentation on the implementation, API/extension points, I can use the API via Groovy-scripts, etc. Good luck finding something similarly documented in the proprietary section. Ever tried to write a parser for Excel- or Word-Documents? Without using proprietary plugins? Not even MS themselves managed to keep their Office-versions downwards-compatible (I didn't try the latest versions. A couple of years ago, colleagues came to me because they knew I had OpenOffice and could load new documents, store them in old format, and vice-versa. Storing in old format from newer MS-Office version frequently failed.
Oh. In that case I should really talk to Cloudbees and ask them why we pay so much for our support-contract for Jenkins. And while I'm at it, I might ask jfrog, why they take money for their Artifactory-support. I probably missed something there...
Yes, true in this case. E.g. for Android it's different, because it already has some market share. In case of Jenkins we also implement plugins or submit fixes to available plugins. We are part of those working their buns off, and still we get more benefit than costs. Because copying software simply is free. It does not cost more to provide the same software to 10^8 people instead of only 10^3. But the bigger the user-commnity is, the higher the number of contributors, even if they remain a tiny fraction overall.
A lot of critical infrastructure nowadays is open-source driven. Starting with billions of mobile phones, wireless routers, databases, going to the very top100 of supercomputing, and down again to wrist-watches.
Seriously, your reasons sound surprisingly alike the typical Microsoft-BS.
Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum
(Score: 4, Funny) by Grishnakh on Tuesday May 26 2015, @05:59PM
Can you show me a decent proprietary source-control-system?
That's easy: IBM Rational ClearCase.
Just kidding; that thing is an abomination, and it's mind-boggling that so many big companies pay huge amounts of money for licensing and support costs for it. In fact, ClearCase is basically the poster child for how awful proprietary software can be.
(Score: 2) by q.kontinuum on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:01PM
For a moment you had me there. I had to deal with ClearCase once, some time ago...
Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum
(Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:16PM
I had one job where I had to use it daily. It really wasted a lot of my time. AFAICT, it might have made a little sense back in the 80s when it was first developed, but it stopped making any sense after about 2000, when everything else passed it up.
What ClearCase really is is a poster child for inertia. It made sense for big companies to use it for big projects in a time when there weren't any really good alternatives (they had CVS back then, but for really big projects, especially multi-site projects, that had a lot of issues). So these big companies bought into it, made it their "corporate standard", and now decades later they're stuck with it and they refuse to change because everything is locked up in it. I believe there's actually some programs to migrate CC data to Subversion or Git, but again inertia rears its ugly head: no one wants to be the one to risk their management reputation on doing this, so it never gets done.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @10:44PM
ClearCase has been killed by CVS and Subversion with progress on Git killing off SVN. Thank fucking god. At least it isn't CA Harvest *shudder*
(Score: 1) by Dr Spin on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:00PM
Use proprietary software for infrastructure?
Would you stake your entire business on a horse when its legs are hidden under a blanket?
Are you nuts?
There may be justification for closed source apps, but the only justification for closed source
infrastructure is that there is no open source alternative.
Specify Oracle once, regret forever!
Warning: Opening your mouth may invalidate your brain!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:45PM
it only works because a few core people have worked their buns off
I was afraid that the editor would put my Google translation up beside the original Spanish-language page link (and he did).
In the process, my note at the end of the summary that mentioned that the brand of the whiteboard with the LOUSY MANUFACTURER SUPPORT got truncated.
That manufacturer is Hitachi.
copying software simply is free.
I would have used the word "redistributing"--but, yeah.
It does not cost more to provide the same software to 10^8 people instead of only 10^3.
When talking about fixing a shortcoming, my way of say that is "You only have to solve the problem ONCE".
Send your solution upstream to the kernel|distro|app guys; park it on a server and let everyone know they can make copies for themselves and/or they can send copies to anyone and/or link to your page.
Folks trying to make FOSS sound difficult are being disingenuous.
This stuff goes directly to M$'s recent attempts to claim that they have released stuff as "open".
Heh. Just try to -alter- that stuff and -redistribute- it.
You'll find out in a big hurry how "open" it is when an M$ lawyer sends you a nastygram after you have tried to -share- your improvements to M$'s code.
"We will allow you to read this" is NOT "open".
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by q.kontinuum on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:04PM
To honour the facts, afaik MS is nowadays one of the bigger contributors to the Linux kernel. This [theinquirer.net] link is already three years old, but from what I read, they are still contributing (maybe a little less than 2012).
I could well imagine them funding Poettering and systemd ;-)
Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum
(Score: 2, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:42PM
As I have mentioned previously, [soylentnews.org] most of the kLOCs that MICROS~1 has "contributed" are crap and have to be removed.
As also mentioned there, the only reason M$ "contributed" was they got caught violating GPL--otherwise their code would have remained closed and proprietary.
...and it's interesting that you mention 2012.
That was the year that OpenStack dropped Hyper-V because M$ wouldn't continue to support it,
(Also mentioned in my previous post.)
I have also recently seen an item that says M$ is trying to get back in through a side door via an OpenStack vendor with low morals concerning with whom they will associate.
Note the Mod'ing of my comment there as well.
M$ fanboys have serious problems with the truth about Redmond.
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday May 26 2015, @08:21PM
Send your solution upstream to the kernel|distro|app guys; park it on a server and let everyone know they can make copies for themselves and/or they can send copies to anyone and/or link to your page.
Folks trying to make FOSS sound difficult are being disingenuous.
It's not completely disingenuous. The problem is, if a FOSS solution simply doesn't exist, creating one takes time and energy and expertise. How much is a function of the difficulty of the project. So if a proprietary solution already exists, it's easier to just use that. However, you're right, if enough people (or the right people) get annoyed and someone makes a FOSS solution, suddenly this problem is no longer a problem for anyone; anyone can download it for free and use it. But someone's gotta do the work first. For some projects, this isn't as hard, because interested people exist who want to tackle the project (look at, say, Inkscape). For other projects, no one wants to bother (look at, say, tax preparation software).
Someone else made a good comment: imagine how things would be if everyone, instead of spending $$$ on proprietary solutions, donated 10% of that to FOSS development.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @09:05PM
Another thing that I haven't seen mentioned yet is bounties on specific bugs|desired features.
The advent of online crowdsourcing makes collective action by folks with the same gripe easier than ever.
Anyone ever see anything like that happen with proprietary software?
-- gewg_
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Nerdfest on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:38PM
I did a rebuild about a year ago on a laptop for a friend who was taking a nursing program. After several crashes, malware infections, and the loss of some data, I rebuilt the machine for her with a new install of Windows 7 and a partition for Ubuntu Linus. I showed her how to select the OS at boot time.
She ended up finishing the report she'd lost data on in Linux, and was pretty pleased. This weekend she came by to see if I could fix her machine. Windows would no longer boot. I assumed it was a malware problem or something again, but apparently all she'd only ever booted it accidentally and installed updates. She needed to get in this time as there was a piece of work software that needed Windows.
Turns out she actually preferred running Linux ... and this was the Unity desktop, which I'm not even that thrilled with myself. I set Windows up in a VM this time (Snapshots are so handy when running windows). She'd set up wallpaper, installed software like DarkRoom (great photo editing suite), and never had any problems or had to ask for help (except for how to get music on her Samsung phone ... they do something weird and don't support MTP).
I think people are a little out of date on just how usable FOSS software is.
In a related topic, it took six frikkin' reboots before all updates were installed and many hours. I sure don't miss that.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 26 2015, @10:56PM
Years ago, I worked in a Windows beige box shop. The owner promised someone a new computer by a particular time of day, without running it by me first, and didn't bother telling me until 2 hours before it was due to arrive. No real problem, hardware takes about 30-40 minutes to throw into a case, Windows took about the same to install. Then came the patches.
Now, keeping in mind that this was a top-of-the-line machine for the day, it took two hours just to load the service pack. That rebooted, and then I had to install the next batch of patches (farmers who didn't have broadband), which took another hour or so. They were really angry when they left - I was angry, too, as the boss had blamed me for it after actively keeping me from starting on the machine until late in the day.
Aside: That actually wasn't the first time he'd done that. The first time he did that, a customer brought her computer in, and every time I put it on the bench to work on it in the knowledge that he'd promised a one day turn-around, he took it off and shouted at me. Eventually, the woman arrived for her computer and I hadn't started on it, so he blamed me for that. She left, angry, I put it on the bench, and got shouted at for doing so.
She came back an hour later, and I'd just put it on the bench again and this time she was shouting at him because it wasn't ready. Eventually, when I was part way through the job, she just started shouting to give him the bloody thing, which she took away to the competition a few doors down the road, and they had it up and running in about 90 minutes. She even bagged him on a few review sites for it, along with a few dozen other customers where he'd sent me out without telling me what was going on, and they were disgusted by it.
There was one particular church I went to, where I had problems with one network install because of a package he knew and I didn't. He went up to work on it, fucked the whole lot up, put two of the five computers and the modem on 192.168.1.*, one on 10.1.1.*, another on 10.0.0.*, and another on 192.168.0.*, came back, told me I was going to have to go back and just work it out, oh, and sell them a new laptop because the network access problems were clearly caused by the one guy who had a MacBook. I went back, rebuilt the network again, fixed the package (took about a minute when I realised what had happened), and was done.
I was shouted at for not selling them a new laptop because the MacBook was clearly the problem and when they rang up in a few days with the same problem, I was going back up there in my own spare time to fix it. We didn't hear from them again.
Unbelievably, it's 7 years later and the guy is still in business.
(Score: 2) by meisterister on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:13PM
- Interoperability. While you can put this on whichever side you care to (proprietary lock-in is the big lever for established players), it is a problem. I can read/write .doc and .xls with no problem, but as soon as someone comes with OOXML formats, interoperability goes down the toilet.
I would like to point out that this is pretty much false for Windows versions of Office. Libre/Open Office has been able to read Microsoft's file formats for quite a while now, but the main problem has arisen when MS products need to read the free documents. In Windows, Office seems to be able to read OpenDocument Text files and such fairly well, but on the Mac all hell breaks loose as soon as you try.
So basically the problem is that Microsoft is incompatible with Free Software more than Free Software is incompatible with Microsoft.
(May or may not have been) Posted from my K6-2, Athlon XP, or Pentium I/II/III.
(Score: 2) by darkfeline on Wednesday May 27 2015, @10:47PM
>FOSS is generally less capable that proprietary software. Photoshop vs. Gimp. LibreOffice-Impress vs. PowerPoint.
This is true. LibreOffice Writer still doesn't support outlining, for god's sake.
>FOSS documentation sucks.
All documentation sucks, as a rule, but I much prefer FOSS documentation to proprietary documentation, which as a rule doesn't exist. With FOSS, I at least have a guaranteed hope of figuring out how something works: read official documentation -> use Google, public discussion forums, and the mailing list -> read the source. With proprietary software, read official documentation (utterly useless or non-existent) -> use Google -> give up.
Here's one example: I was looking for a MS Word feature recently. I couldn't find it in the built-in help. I found it on MS's website using Google, except it applied to a different version of Word and the feature has been moved somewhere else. More Googling, no luck. Playing around with Word I managed to find the feature and enable it somewhere in the GUI maze. Now I had a greyed-out button on my GUI toolbar. Great.
After more experimentation, I did manage to get it to work, but the documentation was not very helpful.
>Interoperability. While you can put this on whichever side you care to (proprietary lock-in is the big lever for established players), it is a problem. I can read/write .doc and .xls with no problem, but as soon as someone comes with OOXML formats, interoperability goes down the toilet.
The last time I had an ODF document corrupted was never. The last time I had a Word document corrupted was a few years ago. Your results may vary. In particular, interoperability between different distributions of fools varies.
Note that the universal open source format is plain text, which works very well everywhere.
Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!