Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday May 27 2015, @11:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the big-burly-bulky-beefy dept.

Boom times in Silicon Valley call for hard work, and hard work — at least in technology land — means that coders, engineers and venture capitalists are turning to liquid meals with names like Schmoylent, Soylent, Schmilk and People Chow. The protein-packed products that come in powder form are inexpensive and quick and easy to make — just shake with water, or in the case of Schmilk, milk. While athletes and dieters have been drinking their dinner for years, Silicon Valley's workers are now increasingly chugging their meals, too, so they can more quickly get back to their computer work.

Demand for some of the powdered drinks, which typically mix nutrients like magnesium, zinc and vitamins, is so high that some engineers report being put on waiting lists of one to six months to receive their first orders. And the drinks are taking off across techie social circles. Venture capitalists have also poured money into the companies that offer the meal replacements, and investors including Alexis Ohanian, a founder of Reddit, count themselves as fans of the drinks.


[Editor's Comment: Original Submission]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:29PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:29PM (#188585) Journal
    • Eating tasty food is a vice.
    • Bad taste is suffering.
    • Soylent relieves vice and suffering by removing taste entirely.
    • Soylent is necessary for human enlightenment.
    • Soylent is optimal.

    You don't need to be a Silicon Valley revolutionary to choose Soylent. You just share a goal of transcending human limits.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by JeanCroix on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:36PM

    by JeanCroix (573) on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:36PM (#188592)
    I knew it! A transhumanist plot!
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @06:50PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @06:50PM (#188729)

      JeanCroix.... JC.... we are on you Mr. Denton!

  • (Score: 1) by rondon on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:01PM

    by rondon (5167) on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:01PM (#188605)

    Real question - is this performance art or shilling? Or something else entirely?

    • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:08PM

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:08PM (#188610) Journal

      It's performance shilling you can believe in.

      I'm sympathetic to the Soylent cause, but I don't practice it. I just think "why would you want to give up food" is a stale, tasteless response.

      Now replacing livestock with lab-grown meat, there's a worthy cause.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @04:05PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @04:05PM (#188668)

        "It's performance shilling you can believe in."

        Golden. You, sir, win the internets for today,

  • (Score: 1) by acp_sn on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:11PM

    by acp_sn (5254) on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:11PM (#188611)

    Enjoying sensual pleasures in moderation isn't detrimental to "transcending human limits".

    Suffering isn't caused by physical discomfort, it is caused by lack of individual sovereignty.

    If another person makes you to eat food you don't like by threat or force then the bad taste is suffering.

    The choice between eating immediately available food that you like slightly less or waiting and being slightly hungry for a short time until more palatable food is available is the very definition of a trivial problem. If your goal is to transcend human limits then wasting energy worrying about other people's food isn't advancing that agenda.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:28PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @02:28PM (#188618)

      > Suffering isn't caused by physical discomfort, it is caused by lack of individual sovereignty.

      Spoken by someone who has never experienced significant physical discomfort.

    • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Wednesday May 27 2015, @03:32PM

      by urza9814 (3954) on Wednesday May 27 2015, @03:32PM (#188655) Journal

      If another person makes you to eat food you don't like by threat or force then the bad taste is suffering.

      The choice between eating immediately available food that you like slightly less or waiting and being slightly hungry for a short time until more palatable food is available is the very definition of a trivial problem. If your goal is to transcend human limits then wasting energy worrying about other people's food isn't advancing that agenda.

      Well...you can't just wait out the threat of malnutrition... ;)

  • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Thursday May 28 2015, @06:17AM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Thursday May 28 2015, @06:17AM (#188970)

    We should also remove free will. It leads to capriciousness suffering, the indulgence of vices, and would be quite optimal. Arguably, it would pave the way for enlightenment too. Why not?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
    • (Score: 2) by dyingtolive on Thursday May 28 2015, @06:20AM

      by dyingtolive (952) on Thursday May 28 2015, @06:20AM (#188975)

      Err, capriciousness COMMA suffering. See? If I lacked free will, i could have been implemented with a routine that forced me to click preview first!

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!