SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Obama administration has asked the United States Supreme Court to decline Google's appeal against a 2014 federal appeals court ruling finding copyright infringement of Oracle's Java code:
The case involves how much copyright protection should extend to the Java programing language. Oracle won a federal appeals court ruling last year that allows it to copyright parts of Java, whilst Google argues it should be free to use Java without paying a licencing fee. Google, which used Java to design its Android smartphone operating system, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court then asked the Obama administration in January for its opinion on whether it should take the case because the federal government has a strong interest. The Federal Trade Commission, for instance, must ensure companies do not break antitrust laws when claiming software copyright protection against each other.
According to Google, an Oracle victory would obstruct "an enormous amount of innovation" because software developers would not be able to freely build on each others' work. But Oracle says effective copyright protection is the key to software innovation.
In the court filing on Tuesday, U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli said Google's argument that the code is not entitled to copyright protection lacks merit and did not need to be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Verrilli added that Google had raised important concerns about the effect that enforcement of Oracle's copyright could have on software development, but said those issues could be addressed via further proceedings on Google's separate "fair use" defence in San Francisco federal court.
Google v. Oracle, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 14-410
[Editor's Comment: Original Submission]
(Score: 4, Informative) by frojack on Thursday May 28 2015, @05:15PM
There has been no ruling.
And the "White House" and Obama had nothing to do with it. It was the equally clueless Justice Department, who submitted a brief in response to a Supreme Court invitation to comment. SCOTUS asks for amicus briefs on just about every case, DOJ responds on almost every case. Justice wouldn't know a header file if it bit them in the ass.
This administration has pretty much run out of good will with the courts, and the court is clearly able to see the government has no legitimate reason to be on one side of the issue vs the other, and will arrive at the conclusion that favors were owed and are being repaid. If you listen carefully you can just about hear the "plonk" from here.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 1) by Placenta on Thursday May 28 2015, @05:17PM
Java doesn't use header files.
(Score: 2) by jcross on Thursday May 28 2015, @07:01PM
I bet most implementations of a JVM do though, and I think that's probably what's in question here.