SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A startup company called Pembient is developing a process to synthesize rhino horns. Their aim is to mass produce fakes that are indistinguishable from real horns, and hence destroy the profit motive for killing wild rhinos.
The plan begins with using modified yeast cells to produce a substance called keratin, the main component of the horn. Various trace elements found in natural horns are added in, as well as genuine rhino DNA. From these materials, a 3D printer is then used to recreate the complex structure of the horn. The only things that are missing, are the trace elements of pollutants that have made their way into the real rhino horn over time. This makes the synthetic horn more pure than the real one.
Some wildlife groups are very skeptical of the plan.
Pembient's concept, which another company – Rhinoceros Horn LLC – is also pursuing a version of, has raised the hackles of conservation groups from the World Wildlife Foundation to the wildlife monitoring network Traffic. It panders to consumers' behaviour rather than trying to change it, which could set back efforts to educate, they say. "There is general horror at the idea," says Cathy Dean, international director of the UK-based charity Save the Rhino, which earlier this month issued a joint statement with the International Rhino Foundation opposing the synthetic horn. Dean adds that ersatz horn is unlikely to dent the market – if people can afford the real thing they are going to buy it – and rebukes the company for failing properly to consult conservation professionals on the idea first.
(Score: 1) by WillAdams on Friday May 29 2015, @08:08PM
See other comment where I ask whether the people in question would accept the fakes or no.
Ages ago, my mother wanted the antlers from my first buck to grind up to make a medicinal product --- when I demurred and instead told her that we could look up the chemical consituents of the antlers and use the raw chemicals instead and that it would be just as efficacious, she became agitated in a manner unique to Korean moms and would not accept even the idea of the substitute.
It's superstition. If it wasn't they'd look up the relevant chemicals and have that compounded by their local pharmacist since that would be less expensive.
I grew up in a culture akin to the one in question (and which shares many beliefs) --- I was delivered by a midwife who declared, ``When I was young, we wouldn't keep a baby like this, we'd put him on the hill for the wolves.'' --- to reiterate, it's superstitious nonsense, and the sooner it can be stamped out by a decent education, the sooner the world will be a better place.