Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday May 29 2015, @11:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the bias-removal-or-indoctrination? dept.

When the desired behavior is performed, a sound is played. When the test subjects reach deep sleep, that same sound is played repeatedly. Subjects were then more likely to perform the desired behavior.

The article, "Unlearning implicit social biases during sleep" appears in the journal Science; an abstract and full report are available.


[Original Submission - Ed.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Saturday May 30 2015, @08:21AM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Saturday May 30 2015, @08:21AM (#190025) Journal

    "Maybe on another world, maybe on this very ground swept clean. A year from now, ten? They'll swing back to the belief that they can make people... better. And I do not hold to that. So no more runnin'. I aim to misbehave. "
    Capt. Malcolm Reynolds.

    Now that may be the great outlaw libertarian mantra, put in such great context by the genius of Joss Whedon. But I have to ask, " Can I make a suggestion that doesn't involve violence, or is this the wrong crowd for that? " (Wash, the pilot of Serenity).

    So you and I, out of the thousands of Soylentils, have come to the conclusion that it is only through the discipline of critical thinking that the pox of racism, sexism, and overall dickish behaviour shall be cured. I take your hand, brother, for truly you are such, and we together will face the onslaught of racists who think that just having different thoughts means that all thought is equally valid! But you realize the downside of this responsibility: Reavers, we made them! (Wash, again. Not surprising that he is the only crew member who gets killed off. )

    Not malicious, it is only that when racists are confronted with the logical implications, they tend to cut on themselves and others. So if we can get them to change their behavior when they are asleep, I am all for that, and I imagine Joss is too.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @12:10PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @12:10PM (#190078)

    and we together will face the onslaught of racists who think that just having different thoughts means that all thought is equally valid!

    Most bigotry hinges on the idea that being human requires one to have a specific amount of melanin, a specific set of genitals, a specific sexual orientation or identity, or worship a specific god. Anyone with half a brain sees how fallicious this is; bigotry is, by definition, delusional; it is not and never will be valid.

  • (Score: 1) by Murdoc on Sunday May 31 2015, @02:01AM

    by Murdoc (2518) on Sunday May 31 2015, @02:01AM (#190282)

    Yeah, I liked Wash's comment there too.

    So why do you think that so many people here seem against these ideas? They generally seem in favor of more critical thinking education in other threads, so is it just this issue? Maybe it's just random chance who happened to comment; not everyone sees every post and comment. I saw the responses to your recent 'troll' post, and while people did bring up some valid additional factors, they were far from as useful of solutions to the problem. Such as "more diversity", etc. Well, to get that, you pretty much have to reduce the racism first, don't you? But with CT, you can teach people that, not for the purpose of changing their minds about racism directly, but to help them in their lives, such as careers, relationships, education, avoiding scams, etc., and I can't see many people not wanting that (one term I like is "intellectual self-defence"). Then, once they are good at it, they'll have to apply it to their racism/sexism/whatever, and if they are good enough, they will change their minds. One strategy I'd like to try for instance is teaching them about meme allergies [lucifer.com]. If you can get them to agree that they are bad, and that looking for your own and eradicating them is a good idea, they'll practically do it themselves (although some may need help with that). A more comprehensive CT program would likely work even better, I think.