Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday May 29 2015, @09:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the getting-all-they-can-give dept.

Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, aka the "Dread Pirate Roberts," has been sentenced to life in prison on multiple charges by a federal judge in Manhattan. The charges he faced carried a minimum sentence of 20 years, but he received the maximum sentence of life in prison for "engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise" (The Kingpin Statute):

Ross Ulbricht, the man behind illegal online drug emporium Silk Road, was sentenced to life in prison on Friday by Judge Katherine Forrest of Manhattan's US district court for the southern district of New York. Before the sentencing the parents of the victims of drug overdoses addressed the court. Ulbricht broke down in tears. "I never wanted that to happen," he said. "I wish I could go back and convince myself to take a different path." Ulbrict was handed five sentences one of 20 year, one of 15 years, one of five and two of life. All are to be served concurrently.

Ulbrict, 31, begged the judge to "leave a light at the end of the tunnel" ahead of his sentence. "I know you must take away my middle years, but please leave me my old age," he wrote to Forrest this week. Prosecutors wrote Forrest a 16-page letter requesting the opposite: "[A] lengthy sentence, one substantially above the mandatory minimum is appropriate in this case."

Forrest rejected arguments that Silk Road had reduced harm among drug users by taking illegal activities off the street. "No drug dealer from the Bronx has ever made this argument to the court. It's a privileged argument and it's an argument made by one of the privileged," she said.

Also at Ars Technica, Wired, and The Verge. Ulbricht faces additional charges in Maryland over an alleged murder-for-hire plot.


[Original Submission - Ed.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by dyingtolive on Friday May 29 2015, @11:13PM

    by dyingtolive (952) on Friday May 29 2015, @11:13PM (#189888)

    Totally right. We should punish him the same manner as anyone who sells products known to be potentially harmful to humans if they take too much of them.

    Quick, someone look up what we did to the heads of the tobacco, alcohol, and fast food/soda industries.

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for moose wang!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @07:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @07:57AM (#190020)

    Too bad guns don't harm people.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @11:50AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @11:50AM (#190071)

      Oh, of course! Guns don't cause any harm at all! Guns should be given away for free to anyone who wants them! They should be sold as childrens' toys since they're the most harmless thing in the world. Those pesky bullets fired from them, on the other hand, those do all the harm, so instead of gun manufacturers we must hold bullet manufacturers responsible for their clients' and targets' deaths.