Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday May 30 2015, @09:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the sneaking-it-in-under-the-wire dept.

The Economist reports that based on an analysis of census data the proportion of all women who reach their mid-40s without ever having a child has fallen, but the decline is sharpest among the best-educated women. In 1994, 35% of women with a doctoral degree aged 40 to 44 were childless; by last year, this had fallen to 20%. Their families are bigger, too. In 1994, half of women with a master’s degree had had two more or more children. By last year, the figure was 60%. Why might older, better-educated women be having more children? Partly because access to education has widened—and so women who were always going to have children are spending more time in college. Another reason is that fertility treatment has improved dramatically, and access to that, too, has widened. Older women who, in the past, wanted children but were unable to have them are now able to.

But according to demographer Philip Cohen this does not explain the entire leap. Social changes in the nature of marriage seem to be driving the change. Whereas marriage was once near-universal and unequal, in recent decades it has become a deliberate option and more equal. Well-educated women have been able to form strong relationships with similarly brainy men, in which both parents earn and both do some child care. Getting an education and having a career are no longer always a barrier to having children; sometimes, they make it easier. Also as more career-minded women have had children, they have become powerful enough to demand time off from their employers. Although America has no national system of paid maternity leave, many professional firms now offer paid maternity leave—Ernst & Young, an accountancy firm, offers 39 weeks to its employees, for example. Meanwhile poorer women have had little luck of that sort. "If I’m a lower-income woman," says Stephanie Coontz, "do I want to hitch myself to a guy who may become just another mouth to feed?”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @10:06AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 30 2015, @10:06AM (#190050)

    OMG! MikeeUSA will not be happy about this, at all! Adult women, having babies? Of their own volition? And most likely without a man's permission! I can just feel his scrotes shrinking into a tiny ball. You know, the Bible says, stone the pedofiles, for they are nasty by anyone's standards.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +4  
       Funny=4, Total=4
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 31 2015, @09:52AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 31 2015, @09:52AM (#190370)

    "stone" "pedofiles"
    Maybe your christian new testament after being interpreted by Womans Christian Temperance Movement inspired american protestants.

    But the Old Testament thinks differently
    Deuteronomy 22 28-29, hebrew.

    (If you wish to argue about taphas, here's a refutation of your arguments:
    http://pastebin.com/mzFJyxea [pastebin.com] )
    No Death for child rapist, as html: http://pastebin.com/CaAwbpbK [pastebin.com]