Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Tuesday June 02 2015, @02:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the no-such-thing-as-bad-publicity dept.

If you read SoylentNews, Ars Technica, Reddit, or anywhere other than the other site, you've probably heard about SourceForge hijacking accounts and monetizing open source software with crapware installers. It seems the other site is intent on burying that information. Perhaps they don't consider it newsworthy?

For those still using SourceForge, there are many superior alternatives.

Update: 06/02 03:27 GMT by mrcoolbp : Slashdot ran the story this morning.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by MichaelDavidCrawford on Tuesday June 02 2015, @04:43AM

    by MichaelDavidCrawford (2339) Subscriber Badge <mdcrawford@gmail.com> on Tuesday June 02 2015, @04:43AM (#191029) Homepage Journal

    Not tech news - just regular news, like world events.

    From time to time I think I've found an unbiased source but then it becomes plainly apparent that the publisher has an axe to grind.

    --
    Yes I Have No Bananas. [gofundme.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 02 2015, @07:47AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 02 2015, @07:47AM (#191063)
    There isn't one. The best strategy I've found for news that matters to me would be to look at reporting from several sources, and try to filter out the bias that way.
    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by archshade on Tuesday June 02 2015, @10:59AM

      by archshade (3664) on Tuesday June 02 2015, @10:59AM (#191096)

      Also if you find a news source you like that isn't insanely biassed you can usually see the pattern of bias and mentally adjust for it. Most media outlets have a running bias across all writers so its not that hard. Once you become aware of the expected bias at the organization level you can look at the individual writers and add a second level of adjustment to them.

      Of course this does not replace multiple news sources. Also always question numbers, look where they came from. Who benefits? Are the conclusions made the conclusions possible? etc...

    • (Score: 2) by Non Sequor on Tuesday June 02 2015, @10:50PM

      by Non Sequor (1005) on Tuesday June 02 2015, @10:50PM (#191326) Journal

      My solution is to stop trying to look for unbiased news and just argue against any person I'm talking to, regardless of the topic or their stance on it.

      --
      Write your congressman. Tell him he sucks.
  • (Score: 2) by mrcoolbp on Tuesday June 02 2015, @02:35PM

    by mrcoolbp (68) <mrcoolbp@soylentnews.org> on Tuesday June 02 2015, @02:35PM (#191147) Homepage

    Honestly it's pretty tough to do, humans are inherently biased, especially in this global culture we live in.

    We (the SN editors) do strive to be "neutral and factual", but it's not as simple as intending to do so. One of the things we have going for us is that we don't seek profits or motivation to get page-views (no ads etc.), so there's no push for click-bait, but it does slip through (we mostly post what comes in as submissions, and they often have bias or clickbait that we are constantly trying to remove). We really are (believe it or not) just trying to report on what we see come down the pipe, and give the community what they want. Even there, the community is diverse enough that this task isn't as simple as one might hope. (/rambling)

    --
    (Score:1^½, Radical)