Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 03 2015, @01:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the bit-by-bit-by-bit dept.

A story from a few days ago:

A controversial proposed judicial rule change allowing judges to issue warrants to conduct "remote access" against a target computer regardless of its location has been approved by a United States Courts committee, according to the Department of Justice.

Federal agents have been known to use such tactics in past and ongoing cases: a Colorado federal magistrate judge approved sending malware to a suspect's known e-mail address in 2012. But similar techniques have been rejected by other judges on Fourth Amendment grounds. If this rule revision were to be approved, it would standardize and expand federal agents' ability to surveil a suspect and to exfiltrate data from a target computer regardless of where it is. (Both the United States Army and the Drug Enforcement Administration are known to have purchased such exploits, most likely zero-days.)

This should become even more significant as the Internet of Things moves forward.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 03 2015, @01:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 03 2015, @01:51PM (#191585)

    Doublespeak was here a while back. A few years back in Indiana, it was legal for police to illegally enter [nwitimes.com] homes and citizens could do nothing about it. Thankfully this has been fixed, but its mindboggling how a judge could say "We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence."