Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday June 04 2015, @04:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the Darwin-would-be-proud dept.

The Scientist reports on a study of a villages in Argentina, where the people have been drinking poison—arsenic, to be specific—for thousands of years. The levels in the principal water source is up to 80 times the level considered to be safe by the World Health Organization (WHO). Even the best wells exhibit over 20 times the arsenic allowed in the WHO limit.

And it doesn't seem to bother them at all. There is every indication that these Andean communities may have evolved the ability to metabolize arsenic.

Swedish biologist Karin Broberg, of Stockholm’s Karolinska Institute, and colleagues at Uppsala and Lund Universities have been trying to figure out how generations of villagers in the Andean village of San Antonio de los Cobres (SAC), an area of nearly 6,000 residents, have been able to survive this chronic exposure to toxic levels of arsenic.

The researchers knew that a particular allele, AS3MT, located on chromosome 10, was suspected as the main gene involved in arsenic metabolism in humans. But the metabolism rate in these Andean villagers was sky high compared to people elsewhere.

Broberg and her colleagues hypothesized that the remarkable arsenic tolerance of SAC residents might be due to particular variants of AS3MT that confer better arsenic metabolism. They wondered, further, if thousands of years of arsenic exposure had given a survival advantage to individuals with these metabolism-driving alleles and had increased the frequencies of these genetic variants.

By comparing genetic samples and urine from a wide selection of South American populations in Peru, Argentina, and Columbia, they hoped to determine if the arsenic tolerance was simply due to genetic accident, (population drift) or if it was a byproduct of natural selection. Natural selection tends to exhibit itself via higher levels of homozygosity, where particular alleles come from one lineage. (See here for a primer on Drift vs Selection.

In the area around AS3MT, the SAC population differed dramatically from the comparison populations. Not only did the SAC women have higher levels of protective AS3MT alleles, but these alleles also had longer stretches of homozygosity—a telltale sign of selection.

The extremely strong difference in allele frequency is considered a clear result of selective pressure on a population.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 04 2015, @06:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 04 2015, @06:22PM (#192214)

    And yet, we still claim that peoples separated by continents and evolving for far longer periods of time have no discernible differences (because we're ashamed to look, since we might find out that evolution doesn't stop at the neck).

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   0  
       Redundant=1, Insightful=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Redundant' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 04 2015, @10:50PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 04 2015, @10:50PM (#192294)

    Redundant mod? No. That is, at best, fraud.

    People are different because their genes are different. Few people have the iron resolve to do science that could lead to socially unacceptable results. Still, facts are facts whether they are socially egalitarian or not.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 05 2015, @06:10AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 05 2015, @06:10AM (#192387)

    And yet, we still claim that peoples separated by continents and evolving for far longer periods of time have no discernible differences

    Really? There are people who think that the skin colour is not discernible, or who think that European and Asian faces look just the same?