Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Friday June 05 2015, @03:08AM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-watch-the-box dept.

Vikas Bajaj writes in The New York Times that the results are in and the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) shows that customer satisfaction with cable TV, Internet and phone service providers have declined to a seven-year low. Of the 43 industries on which the survey solicits opinions, TV and Internet companies tied for last place in customer satisfaction. "Internet and TV have always been among the lowest scoring," says David VanAmburg, director of the Index. "But this year they're at the very bottom."

The study, which is based on more than 14,000 consumer surveys, gives companies a rating from 0 to 100. The ACSI reports huge drops in customer satisfaction for Comcast and Time Warner Cable, following their failed merger. Already one of the lowest-scoring companies in the ACSI, Comcast sheds 10 percent to a customer satisfaction score of 54. Meanwhile, Time Warner Cable earns the distinction as least-satisfying company in the Index after falling 9 percent to 51. Joining Time Warner Cable in the basement is ACSI newcomer Mediacom Communications (51), which serves smaller markets in the Midwest and South. "Customer service in these industries has long been bad," says VanAmburg of Internet and TV providers. "They don't have a good business model for handling inquiries with efficiency and respect. It goes back a decade plus."

Even though those complaints are longstanding, customer frustration has risen along with the ever-rising prices. "You compound all that with the prices customers are paying, and that's the final straw," says VanAmburg. "They're opening bills each month and saying 'I'm paying how much?'" In an age of over-the-top viewing options like Hulu and Netflix, customer dissatisfaction may increasingly translate to companies' bottom lines. "There was a time when pay TV could get away with discontented users without being penalized by revenue losses from defecting customers," says Claes Fornell, chairman and founder of the Index. "But those days are over."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Friday June 05 2015, @01:42PM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday June 05 2015, @01:42PM (#192518) Homepage Journal

    I'm not buying data from them, but I'm using Comcast's internet service since AT&T jacked up the price for DSL. But I haven't had POTS or cable for well over a decade.

    When cable was first available to me, it was a great deal. Analog TV had ghosts, snow, etc, but cable gave you those channels crystal clear, plus half a dozen cable channels, including HBO, that were uncensored and free of commercials. Ten bucks a month.

    Now? 500 channels, almost none of which I would want to watch at five times the price. Cable now not only has commercials, ads even pop up covering part of the screen during the program! And they want fifty bucks for that???

    Digital TV gives me a half dozen channels with a crystal clear picture with higher definition than cable. There is zero reason for me to pay to watch TV, even if the cable companies weren't run by dysfunctional assholes. Bad service on top of a bad package? WTF??

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Friday June 05 2015, @10:10PM

    by frojack (1554) on Friday June 05 2015, @10:10PM (#192696) Journal

    I'm not buying data from them, but I'm using Comcast's internet service

    Typo?

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.