Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Saturday June 06 2015, @07:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the inception dept.

The brain's reaction to certain words could be used to replace passwords, according to a study by researchers from Binghamton University in New York:

In "Brainprint," a newly published study in academic journal Neurocomputing, researchers from Binghamton University observed the brain signals of 45 volunteers as they read a list of 75 acronyms, such as FBI and DVD. They recorded the brain's reaction to each group of letters, focusing on the part of the brain associated with reading and recognizing words, and found that participants' brains reacted differently to each acronym, enough that a computer system was able to identify each volunteer with 94 percent accuracy. The results suggest that brainwaves could be used by security systems to verify a person's identity.

According to Sarah Laszlo, assistant professor of psychology and linguistics at Binghamton University and co-author of "Brainprint," brain biometrics are appealing because they are cancellable and cannot be stolen by malicious means the way a finger or retina can.

Zhanpeng Jin, assistant professor at Binghamton University's departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, doesn't see brainprint as the kind of system that would be mass-produced for low security applications (at least in the near future) but it could have important security applications.

"We tend to see the applications of this system as being more along the lines of high-security physical locations, like the Pentagon or Air Force Labs, where there aren't that many users that are authorized to enter, and those users don't need to constantly be authorizing the way that a consumer might need to authorize into their phone or computer," Jin said.

The project is funded by the National Science Foundation and Binghamton University's Interdisciplinary Collaboratino Grants (ICG) Program.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Saturday June 06 2015, @09:37PM

    by frojack (1554) on Saturday June 06 2015, @09:37PM (#193015) Journal

    To that you have to add changes over time.

    Iris and prints change slowly, but how you feel about the FBI may change radically overnight. Maybe after every beer, or reefer.

    And the mere fact that they have to have something to compare it to suggests that there is a database ripe for stealing, and when you have those, simulating brain waves can't be far behind.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by hemocyanin on Sunday June 07 2015, @12:21AM

    by hemocyanin (186) on Sunday June 07 2015, @12:21AM (#193049) Journal

    Aside from any practical advantages or demerits, the 5th Amendment probably wouldn't protect a brainscan using the same logic that says you can be compelled to give up your fingerprint, but not a password you remember. http://time.com/3558936/fingerprint-password-fifth-amendment/ [time.com]

    There might be some crossover between remembering something and a brain scan, but it isn't like the brain scan is reading the word out of your head, it is simply recording a set repeatable physical characteristics that occur when you think about the password or whatever it is you think about to unlock the device/document/whatever. That's closer to a fingerprint -- a set of repeatable physical characteristics about your fingers. So while you can't be forced to say what you know, you can probably be forced to hand over any physical thing about you, including your brain state when attempting a certain task.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 07 2015, @06:29PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 07 2015, @06:29PM (#193314)

      Simple, when being interrogated with electrodes on your scalp, don't think about what you are supposed to to produce the "brainprint" that unlocks whatever you don't want unlocked. They can't compel you to think things you don't want to think about.

      Maybe it isn't that simple, but this isn't really something the average user will be using anyway. Which makes it unlikely to be an issue in cases where 5th amendment rights come into play.