Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Saturday June 06 2015, @07:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the inception dept.

The brain's reaction to certain words could be used to replace passwords, according to a study by researchers from Binghamton University in New York:

In "Brainprint," a newly published study in academic journal Neurocomputing, researchers from Binghamton University observed the brain signals of 45 volunteers as they read a list of 75 acronyms, such as FBI and DVD. They recorded the brain's reaction to each group of letters, focusing on the part of the brain associated with reading and recognizing words, and found that participants' brains reacted differently to each acronym, enough that a computer system was able to identify each volunteer with 94 percent accuracy. The results suggest that brainwaves could be used by security systems to verify a person's identity.

According to Sarah Laszlo, assistant professor of psychology and linguistics at Binghamton University and co-author of "Brainprint," brain biometrics are appealing because they are cancellable and cannot be stolen by malicious means the way a finger or retina can.

Zhanpeng Jin, assistant professor at Binghamton University's departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, doesn't see brainprint as the kind of system that would be mass-produced for low security applications (at least in the near future) but it could have important security applications.

"We tend to see the applications of this system as being more along the lines of high-security physical locations, like the Pentagon or Air Force Labs, where there aren't that many users that are authorized to enter, and those users don't need to constantly be authorizing the way that a consumer might need to authorize into their phone or computer," Jin said.

The project is funded by the National Science Foundation and Binghamton University's Interdisciplinary Collaboratino Grants (ICG) Program.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by melikamp on Sunday June 07 2015, @09:06AM

    by melikamp (1886) on Sunday June 07 2015, @09:06AM (#193184) Journal

    The study was, obviously, pay-walled so information is lacking...

    Oh well, it's a dead-end anyway. Human brain is terrible for either generating or saving passwords, but it's superb for keeping the rest of the body out of harm's way. So the basic security protocol should go along the lines of having a cyber-brain (either external, like a laptop, or built into the body) which handles all the crypto, while the mushy brain is taking care of keeping the cyber-brain physically secure.

    Not everyone shares this view, and I can't even begin to describe the brain-dead ways of the modern web design. Why are some sites so dead set on forbidding web clients to auto-fill passwords? They actually write very non-trivial javascript code dedicated to making sure that (1) the password fields are typed by a human rather than a web browser software and (2) I cannot use their site without javascript. It's not like they can win this battle, since any piece of software emulating keyboard input will crush their puny efforts. So why are they so intent on making my life miserable? As it stands, I manually copy and paste www credentials out of a spreadsheet. I am basically a very inefficient proxy for my cyber-brain. Sorry if I got off track here, this is just another issue of my "javascript must die" column...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2