Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Sunday June 07 2015, @08:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the red-flag dept.

After seeing problems with the Red Cross response local storm relief (example: 40% of available emergency vehicles used for press conferences), reporter Laura Sullivan decided to look into what happened in Haiti, where the American Red Cross collected a whopping $500 million in donations.

Her report is damning. The largest proportion of these were to go into housing. The Red Cross built...wait for it...six houses. In one area where the Red Cross promised to spend $24 million, and even printed a brochure exclaiming over all that they accomplished, the local residents are unaware of any Red Cross activity.

Meanwhile the Red Cross refuses to provide more than a very high level overview of their projects. No financial figures are provided that would allow one to figure out how much of that $500 million was actually spent on relief, and where the rest of it went.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Sunday June 07 2015, @10:20AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Sunday June 07 2015, @10:20AM (#193208) Journal
    They give the American Red Cross a good rating and claim that their overheads are only 10%. I suspect that this may be accurate for general donations, but that the Red Cross simply didn't know how to deal with a big response to an emergency donations plea. They'd probably have done a fairly good job if they'd only tried to do the emergency relief work that they normally do. This part of TFA stood out:

    "All this work that you are looking at now, the calculation was made by Haitian people, Haitian engineers, Haitian architects, Haitian foreman," he says. "We know what to do."

    The Red Cross does not seem to have used that strategy. In one internal memo, the top manager of the Haiti program complains that Haitians were not being hired for top positions — and in some cases were treated disparagingly.

    It sounds like they're used to appearing in places where the infrastructure is basically gone, providing their own logistical support and keeping people alive until they can start their own rebuilding work, but have absolutely no clue how to handle supporting a rebuilding effort. This isn't normally a problem (it's fine for charities to limit the scope of their work - a 'fix the whole world' charity would have difficulty accomplishing anything), but in this case that had raised far more money than they could spend on their normal kind of relief work, but tried to spend it all anyway.

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 07 2015, @02:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 07 2015, @02:16PM (#193260)

    CharityWatch.org is a great resource, but it's not the final word. You've got to do your own research and also pay attention to the press, for stories like this.

    Unless the ARC puts together a decent rebuttal, which I doubt.

    I guess I'll shift my annual RC contribution to other charities.

    • (Score: 1) by KGIII on Sunday June 07 2015, @11:48PM

      by KGIII (5261) on Sunday June 07 2015, @11:48PM (#193435) Journal

      There is another thing that I do not like... If you donate to RC with a specific tragedy being the intended target of your funds they do not apply it to that target, the place the money in a general fund. My method has been to simply donate to the local chapter which, if I understand correctly, goes to that chapter alone and not to the parent charity. I also realize that putting things into a general fund is easier but I think it should not be much accounting work to take the major projects and keep track of the donations that are intended for those specifically.

      When the recent earthquake trashed Nepal I did not donate to the RC. I did donate to the Prime Minister's Disaster Relief Fund, via the Ministry of Finance, directly. I feel that this was more likely to be beneficial in the long-run. The Nepalese government does not actually have a real problem with corruption. I suspect this is because they have no money.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  • (Score: 1) by KGIII on Sunday June 07 2015, @05:34PM

    by KGIII (5261) on Sunday June 07 2015, @05:34PM (#193300) Journal

    I am actually surprised the overhead is that low with as many chapters at the ARC has.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Phoenix666 on Monday June 08 2015, @04:06AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Monday June 08 2015, @04:06AM (#193503) Journal

    It sounds like they're used to appearing in places where the infrastructure is basically gone, providing their own logistical support and keeping people alive until they can start their own rebuilding work, but have absolutely no clue how to handle supporting a rebuilding effort. This isn't normally a problem (it's fine for charities to limit the scope of their work - a 'fix the whole world' charity would have difficulty accomplishing anything), but in this case that had raised far more money than they could spend on their normal kind of relief work, but tried to spend it all anyway.

    No, the Red Cross doesn't know how to show up in places where the infrastructure is basically gone and provide their own logistical support and keep people alive. At least, not if Haiti is representative. I know because I was centrally involved in coordinating the Haiti response. I was working for a former American President whose wife was running the State Dept. at the time. In 48 hours my team built the digital infrastructure that became the hub for the Red Cross, USAID, UN Logistics Cluster, State Dept, US Marines, and every other significant relief body on the planet; the marines on the USS Bataan that hovered offshore even told us they used our crowd-sourcing map for rescue missions to go dig people out of rubble because it was the only actionable intelligence in the theater (we had set up a map with Ushahidi that put pins at locations where people trapped in the rubble were texting from).

    The entire time I kept asking the Red Cross, the UN, and every one of them what their systems were, what data formats they used, etc so that we could flow the cash and in-kind contributions and volunteers coming through us to them, and they. had. no. such. systems. It was as though it was the first time a disaster had ever happened in the history of the world, and they had utterly no idea what to do. So my team built something from scratch lickety-split and actually saved lives. The Red Cross landed a plane full of bottled water, food, and medicine at the tarmac in Port-au-Prince and promptly had it all stolen at gunpoint by black marketeers because they had apparently never come across the black market before and knew they needed to guard it and distribute it under guard. Penske Trucks donated a fleet of their trucks to Haiti to distribute supplies around the capitol and surrounding countryside, but they sat in the Port of Miami for months because nobody at the Red Cross knew that they had to get export permits or how to get them or how to get the trucks from the transport ship to the shore when the dock facilities at Port-au-Prince were knocked out. After about 3 months they managed to get tents up just in time for hurricane season, which is just gold stars for that one; then everybody in the tent encampments started to get cholera because it occurred to nobody at the Red Cross that you need to take sanitation measures in Refugee camps to prevent that kind of thing.

    I kept asking and asking, how do you guys not know how to do this stuff? Is this not the sole thing that you do? But there was no answer, and no competent person ever came to the fore to straighten things out on the Red Cross's end, and you know that had there been there would have been some such to come forward because of the cachet of working directly with an American President who had gotten personally involved with the thing. It was then that I understood in one moment the truth of government and NGOs, that they comprise rich, connected kids who want to stamp their passport on the way to the CEO job at the family firm, and sycophants who like to go along for that ride. They are no place for skilled people who want to and can make a difference; I knew I wasn't long for that place, and I wasn't.

    When I think back on the colossal, gigantic clusterfuck the Haiti Earthquake relief was, I feel a lot of frustration and contempt for all those who used that tragedy to line their pockets and advance their careers. The Red Cross people certainly did. Still, I do feel enormous satisfaction that I personally was able to use every technical skill acquired over a lifetime in IT to actually, directly, save lives, for the first time in my career. Sometimes I wonder if any of the lives I helped saved will turn out to be the person who cures cancer or something, but then I think that if it meant they got to hug their kids again then everything I've ever done as a professional was worth it. I sleep well on that.

    • (Score: 1) by KGIII on Tuesday June 09 2015, @02:15AM

      by KGIII (5261) on Tuesday June 09 2015, @02:15AM (#193894) Journal

      I will take the karma hit...

      Allow me to say thank you for having done so and having posted your story. Both are appreciated.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday June 09 2015, @12:18PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Tuesday June 09 2015, @12:18PM (#194041) Journal

        Thank you--I was grateful to have the chance to do something meaningful with my skills. Helping those people made me the happiest I've ever been.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.