Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 10 2015, @09:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the unintended-consequences-anyone? dept.

On Dark Web sites like the Silk Road black market and its discussion forums, anonymous visitors could write even the most extreme libertarian and anarchist statements without fear. The rest of the internet, as a few critics of the US judicial system may soon learn, isn't quite so free of consequences.

Last week the Department of Justice issued a grand jury subpoena to the libertarian media site Reason.com, demanding that it identify six visitors to the site. The subpoena letter, obtained and published by blogger Ken White, lists trollish comments made by those six Reason readers that—whether seriously or in jest—call for violence against Katherine Forrest, the New York judge who presided over the Silk Road trial and late last month sentenced Silk Road creator Ross Ulbricht to life in prison.

"It's judges like these that should be taken out back and shot," wrote one user named Agammamon, in a comment thread that has since been deleted from Reason.com's story on Ulbricht's sentencing.

"It's judges like these that will be taken out back and shot," answered another user named Alan.

"Why do it out back? Shoot them out front, on the steps of the courthouse," reads a third comment from someone going by the name Cloudbuster.

The subpoena calls for Reason.com to hand over data about the six users, including their IP addresses, account information, phone numbers, email addresses, billing information, and devices associated with them. And it cites a section of the United States criminal code that forbids "mailing threatening communications." When those communications threaten a federal judge, they constitute a felony punishable by as much as 10 years in prison. (The average internet user has no such protection.)

The Streisand Effect lives.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 10 2015, @09:44PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 10 2015, @09:44PM (#194691)

    Their mothers will be screaming, "How could you be so stupid? Why can't you obey authority like the rest of us? I hope you rot in jail!"

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 4, Funny) by n1 on Wednesday June 10 2015, @10:04PM

    by n1 (993) on Wednesday June 10 2015, @10:04PM (#194701) Journal

    According to an article at Popehat [popehat.com], three of the comments included in the subpoena are as follows:

    Rhywunl5.3l.15 @11:35AMIIt
            I hope there is a special place in hell reserved for that horrible woman.

    AlanI5.31.15 @12:11PMIIt
            There is.

    Product PlacementI5.31.15 @1:22PMIIt
          I'd prefer a hellish place on Earth be reserved for her as well.

    So the their mothers better be careful with the phrasing of 'hope you rot in jail'.

    Just something to consider.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 10 2015, @10:22PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 10 2015, @10:22PM (#194716)

      "That boy was always no good. Lord forgive me for giving birth to him. May he find Jesus in prison."
      *and then the boy's mother crosses herself*