Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday June 11 2015, @02:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the taking-advantage-of-the-best-minds dept.

Sen. John McCain pens an opinion piece on Wired:

America's military technological advantage is eroding—and fast.

For the past decade, our adversaries have invested heavily in rapidly improving their militaries to counter our unique advantages. At the same time, the speed of globalization and commercialization means that advanced disruptive technologies are now—and increasingly will be—available to less sophisticated militaries, terrorist groups, and other non-state actors.

Maintaining our military technological advantage is about much more than a larger defense budget or a better fighter or submarine. These things are important, but to give our military the capabilities it needs to defend the nation, the Department of Defense must be able to access innovation in areas such as cyber, robotics, data analytics, miniaturization, and autonomy, innovation that is much more likely to come from Silicon Valley, Austin, or Mesa than Washington.

[...] There are those who say that even with changes like these, our nation's innovators simply aren't interested in doing business with the Pentagon. And after spending much of my career in Washington scrutinizing Pentagon business practices, I am not exactly surprised to hear such sentiments. But in the final analysis, I believe the brightest minds will always be driven to solve the world's toughest problems. These are the problems our military confronts every day. And these are the problems we can solve if we create an acquisition system that enables the Department of Defense to take advantage of the best minds, firms, and technologies that America and the world have to offer.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 11 2015, @10:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 11 2015, @10:36PM (#195172)

    losing money has nothing to do with it. Tech firms losing money doesn't help but being forced into development of sub par standards, then using those standards industry wide and continuing to develop on these deep rooted flaws has lead to this

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 12 2015, @05:36AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 12 2015, @05:36AM (#195277)

    > losing money doesn't help but being forced into development of sub par standards,

    One case of an essentially unused random-number generator really doesn't qualify as "crippling."
    Fuck realistic assesments, just keep on waving that outrage flag since it makes you feel oh so good.