Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday June 15 2015, @12:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the conflict-of-interest dept.

Roy Schestowitz at TechRights reports:

Microsoft wages war on politics in all sorts of ways, sometimes through lobbyists, sometimes through 'former' staff, pseudo 'charities' like the Gates Foundation, and pressure groups like the Business Software Alliance.

Today we present information given to us courtesy of the California Association of Voting Officials. They complain about Microsoft lobbyists and they have expressed an interest in aligning for global issues, for they too realise that Microsoft cannot be ignored if society wants fair elections and ultimately pursues voting machinery that can be trusted.

Microsoft lobbying in this area is a scarcely explored topic. There is very little information about it out there, hence we hardly ever covered the topic. It is widely known, however, that voting machines in the US use Windows, which has back doors and therefore can never be trusted, with or without tampering by a human operator.

[...]Somehow, despite public will to induce transparency, accountability, audits, etc. on the process, decades later we are still [...] heavily dependent on a proprietary, secretive system (or set thereof).

[...]"We put open source language into voting system legislation", told us [sic] someone from the California Association of Voting Officials, "and the Microsoft lobbyists have it removed.

"This must be stopped as OS voting systems are a preferred security environment for vote tabulation... the alternative being Diebold / Dominion / Microsoft, etc."[...]

The head attorneys for President Obama's election report (which omitted open source voting system solutions even though the information was gifted to them) work for firms that lobby and/or represent Microsoft (Bob Bauer of Perkins Coie and Ben Ginsburg of Pattons Boggs/Jones Day)

Nate Persily was tasked with presenting the President with all information...but inexplicably failed to include any reference to open source in the report. When asked about this omission--and possible steps to remedy (addendum etc)--Persily went silent.

No members of the Presidential Committee were responsive...

In California--which is the frontline of the battle for open source voting systems in the USA--the lobbyist for the California Association of Clerks and Elected Officials Barry Brokaw is also the lobbyist for Microsoft


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Monday June 15 2015, @04:25PM

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Monday June 15 2015, @04:25PM (#196570)

    Well somehow Snowden managed to hit a lot of headlines. I don't know how it is in the US, but in UK it is a pretty big deal - still hitting top headlines every now and then. You probably need a reportable event that you can put in front of the media, even if it is just a report being issued or something. Maybe need to get some comment from a respected international organisation like those mentioned here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_monitoring [wikipedia.org]

    Talking to the folks being elected may help also. They probably don't care if they can rig the votes, they might be more worried if The Other Side can rig the votes...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday June 15 2015, @04:59PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Monday June 15 2015, @04:59PM (#196586) Homepage

    Yep, this is it. If any nationwide attention is to be brought to this, it's gonna be muh Snowden and muh government spying and manipulating.

    I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn that the NSA or other rogue elements within the government were already electronically manipulating votes, although the way the corporate Jew media is doing it should already be considered criminal. And there's not much we can do until we have proof.