Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday June 16 2015, @02:28AM   Printer-friendly
from the thar-she-blows dept.

Russia's Rostech Corporation is to unveil a super-high frequency weapon capable of taking down all kinds of drones, missiles and other high precision weapons. The presentation will be made at the Army-2015 military expo. The Mosow Radio Engineering Institute has developed a super-high frequency (SHF) "cannon." It's designed to knock out aircraft, drones, guided missiles and any airborne high precision weapons using electronics. The cannon creates an air-exclusion zone within a reported radius of over 10 kilometers around the defended object or installation, though the system's exact characteristics are classified.

"This mobile microwave irradiation complex performs off-frequency rejection of electronics aboard low-altitude aerial targets and warheads of high precision weapons," a source in Rostech Corporation told TASS, adding this system puts close range air defenses on a whole new level. "In terms of performance capabilities, the complex has no competitors in the world," the source said. All the equipment is mounted on a tracked Buk missile air defense transportation platform.

http://rt.com/news/267187-shf-cannon-russia-drones/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=RSS

NOTE: I wandered around the net for several minutes, looking for alternative news sources on this cannon. I found exactly three other sources, all of which quote RT. Propaganda? Vaporware? You'll have to decide for yourself.

http://beforeitsnews.com/middle-east/2015/06/russia-to-kill-drones-missiles-with-10km-range-super-high-frequency-cannon-2492552.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Tuesday June 16 2015, @08:57AM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Tuesday June 16 2015, @08:57AM (#196793) Journal

    > It is some neat tech though. Would be very useful against lower-tech or poorly outfitted adversaries.

    Depends just how low-tech. Would this weapon be any use against a WWII-era fighter like a Spitfire or a Zero?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 16 2015, @02:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 16 2015, @02:04PM (#196851)

    That is a worthless statement isn't it? The thing would not be viable against rocks and sticks either. Why didn't you point that out?

    • (Score: 2) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Tuesday June 16 2015, @02:58PM

      by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Tuesday June 16 2015, @02:58PM (#196880) Journal

      Well, if this very expensive bit of kit could be foiled by a relatively low-cost, easy to build counter-aircraft, then surely that's significant.

      There has been criticism of Western militaries arming and equipping to fight another cold war / another WWII, when in fact the only people they actually fight these days are AK-wielding guerillas in the middle of the desert against whom aircraft carriers, air-superiority jets and cruise missiles are of far less use than thousands and thousands of boots on the ground. Could this be Russians falling into the same trap? I can easily imagine some Russian military commander imagining himself completely immune to everything in the sky, then scrambling for his rifle as he sees some home-built single-prop kamikaze planes buzzing in towards him...