Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday June 18 2015, @11:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the from-his-lips-to-gods-ears dept.

Despite the santorum splattered about, the Pontiff of the Church Universal and Triumphant [EDIT: This is actually referring to the Roman Catholic Church, not the Church Universal and Triumphant] is going to agree with the climate change consensus in an encyclical to be released on Thursday. Early leaks give some idea of the content.

Pope Francis is preparing to declare humans as primarily responsible for climate change, call for fossil fuels to be replaced by renewable energy and decry the culture of consumerism, a leaked draft of his much anticipated statement on the environment suggests.

The source for this somehow concerns Australians, but we will take any indication of infallibility where we can get it.

So the humble submitter has to wonder, does this mean that climate-change deniers are now to be considered heretics, rather than just Petro shills or anti-environmental conservative conspiracy theorists? It does add a entirely new dimension to the debate, and I hope that God will forgive your Conservative asses for screwing up Her creation in the quest for profit.

UPDATE - janrinok 18 Jun 12:36UTC

is it possible to update/append aristarchus' post "Pope Affirms Anthropogenic Global Warming" (https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=15/06/17/0317256), as follows:

Update: The encyclical can be read and downloaded here.

I am not affiliated with the submitter, aristarchus, or the pope. I have a slightly paranoid reason for asking for this update; it is my experience that, whenever politically important documents are published, the actual document often gets overshadowed by an enormous load of blog commentary, providing a bit of "damage control" and "spin". It is my fervent opinion that the readership of Soylentnews deserves to read the actual source documents. (It's only 82 pages long, in this case, anyway).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 17 2015, @03:22PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 17 2015, @03:22PM (#197311)

    Try reading the summary... Ignorance about ignorance is a good thing. The two groups greatly overlap...

    god (note the capital you silly ass) is a black woman.

  • (Score: 1) by Fishscene on Wednesday June 17 2015, @03:55PM

    by Fishscene (4361) on Wednesday June 17 2015, @03:55PM (#197345)

    The reference to capitalization was specifically to point out that the author of the summary knew exactly what they were doing when they referenced God as a "Her" - directly contradictory to what He is referred to in the Bible and communicates disrespect. Seems like it was flamebaiting and I bit. :)

    --
    I know I am not God, because every time I pray to Him, it's because I'm not perfect and thankful for what He's done.
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by BasilBrush on Wednesday June 17 2015, @10:08PM

      by BasilBrush (3994) on Wednesday June 17 2015, @10:08PM (#197565)

      You do realise the bible wasn't written in English, right?

      Do you realise that as well as different gender rules, Hebrew and Aramaic don't have any capital letters?

      Clearly not. Christianity, a religion built on ignorance.

      --
      Hurrah! Quoting works now!