Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Wednesday June 17 2015, @10:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the heavy-metal dept.

3D printing started out with tiny plastic structures, and over time it has moved on to larger, more complex, and more solid things, from duck prosthetics to airplane engine parts. Will the next step be infrastructure?

A company named MX3D intends to do just that, with the help of Dutch designer Joris Laaram and Autodesk (providing the software to make this happen). The goal is to use robots to 3D-print a steel bridge over a canal in Amsterdam, basically creating the bridge out of thin-air, like in the rendering above.

Particularly challenging is that the robots will be printing their own supporting structures, so any early mistake or miscalculation will be fatal to the project.

"I strongly believe in the future of digital production and local production, in "the new craft". This bridge will show how 3D printing finally enters the world of large-scale, functional objects and sustainable materials while allowing unprecedented freedom of form," said Joris Laarman, the designer of the bridge. "The symbolism of the bridge is a beautiful metaphor to connect the technology of the future with the old city, in a way that brings out the best of both worlds."

Perhaps self-printing, self-healing infrastructure is the answer to its crumbling all the time.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by RedBear on Thursday June 18 2015, @07:35AM

    by RedBear (1734) on Thursday June 18 2015, @07:35AM (#197713)

    Self-healng is something this would definitely need to be. It's a cute idea, but this welding-in-midair technique seems to create rods and variably-shaped hollow structures (branes?) with extremely rough surfaces. Even if they're welding with stainless steel rod, a rough surface like that is a recipe for instantaneous onset of corrosion, and we're talking about fairly thin pieces of steel here, with minimal thickness and lots of surface area. I'm not sure if the chromium atoms in stainless steel can even form a proper film of chromium oxide to keep a surface that rough from corroding, and I know of no paint or other coating that can effectively protect surface that rough for very long.

    Now, maybe what I'm seeing in the video is just welding slag and surface oxidation that hasn't been ground off yet, but there really shouldn't be too much slag and oxidation with MIG welding, that's kind of the whole point of the "inert gas" part of "Metal Inert Gas" welding. It displaces oxygen to make the weld stronger, cleaner and less prone to cracking. And if it is slag, how would they clean the inside of a hollow surface as you're creating it, if they're going to use that technique? How would you paint the inside of enclosed hollow surfaces? Questions abound.

    I'd be really curious to see this material up close and find out more about how it will hold up to usage stresses and weathering over the long term, especially compared to a typical painted or galvanized bolt-together steel structure. It would also be interesting to see up close exactly how they design the details of the structure, because really the sky's the limit with this technique. Although to start off I think they'll stick with this minimal triangulated lattice structure. But they could theoretically go totally organic looking, as if a bunch of steel cables just happened to grow themselves into a steel bridge. That would knock everyone's socks off.

    Despite the misgivings this is one of those things that makes me feel like I'm actually living in "the future". Pretty cool.

    (I am neither a materials engineer nor a welder, so don't take anything I say too seriously.)

    --
    ¯\_ʕ◔.◔ʔ_/¯ LOL. I dunno. I'm just a bear.
    ... Peace out. Got bear stuff to do. 彡ʕ⌐■.■ʔ
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Thursday June 18 2015, @01:20PM

    by urza9814 (3954) on Thursday June 18 2015, @01:20PM (#197789) Journal

    If it's cheap enough, it doesn't have to last so long. Just have a robot that melts the whole damn thing down and rebuilds it every year. Virtually no labor costs, virtually no materials costs after you build the first iteration...the rebuilds would require nothing but energy. A hell of a lot of energy, but that's still probably a lot cheaper than hiring a whole construction crew.

    And if it breaks, the robot can melt down the cars at the bottom of the canal for more steel to make the next one stronger! In fact, don't even build the first iteration, just program it into Google Maps. And have a robot which roams the canals searching for the resulting wreckage to build bridges out of. Hope someone loses a shipping container down there -- jackpot! :)

  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by dj245 on Thursday June 18 2015, @03:36PM

    by dj245 (1530) on Thursday June 18 2015, @03:36PM (#197853)

    Now, maybe what I'm seeing in the video is just welding slag and surface oxidation that hasn't been ground off yet, but there really shouldn't be too much slag and oxidation with MIG welding, that's kind of the whole point of the "inert gas" part of "Metal Inert Gas" welding. It displaces oxygen to make the weld stronger, cleaner and less prone to cracking. And if it is slag, how would they clean the inside of a hollow surface as you're creating it, if they're going to use that technique? How would you paint the inside of enclosed hollow surfaces? Questions abound.
     
    (I am neither a materials engineer nor a welder, so don't take anything I say too seriously.)

    Those are all excellent points. I am an engineer and have hands on welding experience. There maybe be ways of doing this better, but using a welder as a 3D printer just makes me cringe. In important structural welds, the number of starts/stops is strictly controlled and minimized. The reason is that every time the welder starts and stops, it leaves a discontinuity where failure is much more likely to occur. If you look at the video, the arm seems to be jumping all around the structure- the structure they are building up is thin so it needs time to cool down. Keep in mind that the welding process turns both the filler material (rod) and the base material into a puddle of molten metal. This can be controlled and manipulated, but you can't create a rod-type structure without starting and stopping. A good analogy would be like trying to freeze the water coming out of a hose as fast as it was coming out.

    This also seems like a very expensive way to build a bridge. Welding rod generally costs much more than bulk steel pricing. That doesn't include the argon and electricity costs. I am also concerned about all the welding discontinuities that are inherent (and unavoidable) in the 3d welding process. Plus, as you have mentioned, thin and rough surfaces are a problem for long-term protection from the environment. Using a stainless steel welding material might help, but with all the welding discontinuities, even just normal ambient humidity is going to cause cracks and failures fairly quickly. This process might make sense for art or glamour projects but I don't think it will catch on for general purposes.