Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday June 18 2015, @07:05AM   Printer-friendly
from the Respondeat-Superior dept.

The California Labor Commission has ruled in favor of a former Uber driver in San Francisco, finding that the driver is an employee of the ride-hailing company rather than an independent contractor. The ruling was made earlier but came to light when Uber appealed the decision on Tuesday. Uber could be required to pay the driver $4,152.20 for reimbursement of expenses, but that's only the beginning:

The commission said Uber is "involved in every aspect of the operation." Classifying Uber drivers as employees opens the company up to considerably higher costs, including Social Security, workers' compensation and unemployment insurance. That could affect its valuation, currently above $40 billion, and the valuation of other companies that rely on large networks of individuals to provide rides, clean houses and other services.

Uber had argued that its drivers are independent contractors, not employees, and that it is "nothing more than a neutral technology platform." But the commission said Uber controls the tools driver use, monitors their approval ratings and terminates their access to the system if their ratings fall below 4.6 stars. The ruling affects only California. However, the state is Uber's home base, one of its largest markets, and sets a path often followed by regulators and courts in other states.

Uber did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It likely will not have to start paying any additional costs unless it loses on appeal, and only after it exhausts its appeals. The commission was ruling on an appeal by Uber of a labor commissioner's award of about $4,000 in expenses to San Francisco-based driver Barbara Ann Berwick, who filed her claim in September. She worked as an Uber driver for just over two months last year. Earlier this month, Uber lost a bid to force arbitration in a federal lawsuit brought in San Francisco by its drivers. Earlier this year, the same court rejected Uber's bid to deem its drivers independent contractors, saying a jury would rule on their status. In Florida, a state agency ruled earlier this year that Uber drivers are employees.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by GlennC on Thursday June 18 2015, @12:33PM

    by GlennC (3656) on Thursday June 18 2015, @12:33PM (#197771)

    And if the drivers that Uber contracts with had the correct livery license, there would be no problem.

    If the cars that were used by the Uber drivers had the correct commercial insurance and were properly registered as commercial vehicles.

    Of course, that would involve Uber recognizing the difference between ride-sharing and a taxi service.

    --
    Sorry folks...the world is bigger and more varied than you want it to be. Deal with it.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Thursday June 18 2015, @10:00PM

    by isostatic (365) on Thursday June 18 2015, @10:00PM (#197998) Journal

    That's exactly how it runs in the uk, driver owned cars, licensed, enhanced mot, criminal background checks.
    The taxi drivers still hate it though.