Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday June 19 2015, @08:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the ecosystems-without-apex-predators dept.

Common Dreams reports:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service today declared the eastern puma extinct and removed it from the list of protected wildlife and plants under the Endangered Species Act. The eastern puma was a subspecies of the animal also known as cougar or mountain lion, which is still widely distributed across the West. It once roamed as far north as southeastern Ontario, southern Quebec, and New Brunswick in Canada; south to South Carolina; and west to Kentucky, Illinois, and Michigan.

The eastern puma's range contracted from the 1790s to the 1890s due to human persecution abetted by the extirpation, through hunting, of its primary prey, white-tailed deer. The last three eastern pumas were killed in 1930 in Tennessee, 1932 in New Brunswick, and 1938 in Maine.

"The extinction of the eastern puma and other apex carnivores such as wolves and lynx upended the ecology of the original colonies and beyond," said Michael Robinson of the Center for Biological Diversity. "Over a century after deer went extinct in the Northeast, they have returned with a voracious vengeance, and botanists lament the disappearance of formerly abundant plant communities. We have forests that have lost the top and the bottom of the food chain."

The eastern cougar was extinct well before it was protected under the Endangered Species Act, as was the case with eight of the other 10 species that have been delisted for extinction. Overall the Endangered Species Act has been 99 percent successful at saving species from extinction.

A different subspecies of the puma, the Florida panther, survives in a small, isolated and precarious population at the rapidly urbanizing southern tip of Florida. These animals, too, were once widespread, from their namesake state north to Georgia and west to Arkansas and eastern Texas. Cougars from the mountainous West have reclaimed lost habitat and currently reproduce as small populations in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Nebraska. Individual Florida panthers and midwestern cougars that have traveled long distances have been hit by cars, shot by hunters or killed by authorities in recent years throughout the Midwest and East, but there is no breeding population in the historic range of the eastern puma.

Editor's note: Not so fast; you can comment on the proposed rule at Regulations.gov.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tathra on Friday June 19 2015, @10:03PM

    by tathra (3367) on Friday June 19 2015, @10:03PM (#198452)

    tangomargarine hit the nail on the head. its not about trying to keep everything exactly the same, its about limiting the impact of human-caused extinctions and destruction. sabertooth tigers probably went extinct because their giant saber teeth weren't really suited for hunting, and wooly mammoths could have gone extinct anyway due to changing climate, those extinctions are fine*, but pinta island tortoises, western black rhinos, caribbean monk seals, baiji river dolphins, pyrenean ibexes, ivory-billed woodpeckers, and javan tigers (all went extinct in the past 20 years due to humans) were doing just fine in their ecosystems until humans killed them all for sport, trophies, or by destroying their habitats. comparing natural extinctions to human-driven ones is a false analogy.

    * mostly fine in the case of wooly mammoths; over-hunting definitely had a hand in their extinction, but the climate was changing enough that they might've gone extinct anyway

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Justin Case on Friday June 19 2015, @11:59PM

    by Justin Case (4239) on Friday June 19 2015, @11:59PM (#198499) Journal

    So you're fine with all the creatures nature has provided, except humans?

    Just out of curiosity, what species might you be?

    > comparing natural extinctions to human-driven ones is a false analogy

    I see. You don't think humans are part of nature. Have you identified the planet we came from yet then?

    • (Score: 2) by tathra on Saturday June 20 2015, @09:24AM

      by tathra (3367) on Saturday June 20 2015, @09:24AM (#198590)

      So you're fine with all the creatures nature has provided, except humans?

      straight to the strawman, eh? where, specifically, did i say anything about not being fine with humans, or that i don't think humans are a part of nature? try again, except this time counter what i actually said instead of what you wish i'd said.