Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Saturday June 20 2015, @10:10AM   Printer-friendly
from the singed-brows dept.

Manny Fernandez writes in the NYT that the scores of military and police-style vans, trucks and cars offered for sale on Craigslist and eBay have raised concerns for some law enforcement officials particularly after the Dallas attack on a police headquarters but officials say the vehicles appear to be legal for the most part, so there is little they can do. Jeff Funicello, for example, is selling his black 1975 GMC armored truck on Craigslist. The body is armored, and the windows are bulletproof. It has sliding portholes to point rifles from and a sprinkler system inside. Long ago, it transported money, and it was once the target of a shootout in the 1980s.

Of course, people have been driving reinforced cars long before the Dallas attack on a police headquarters. But the celebrities and executives who install bulletproof windows and other types of armor on their vehicles often do not want it noticed. Celebrity clients generally demand that the exteriors of their luxury armored vehicles look normal so they blend in. However those who buy and sell armored vans want people to look. And the popularity of apocalyptic movies and television shows has put a new twist and added a macabre cachet to such vehicles "This is America," says Funicello. "I should be able to have a howitzer or a bazooka if I want one. If I wanted to buy a fire truck, I could."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by turgid on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:40AM

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:40AM (#198620) Journal

    Anyone under threat from the police and militaries (and their friends) should get themselves armored vehicles and be able to use those in an emergency to get away from (not fight) the cops and find safety. This includes important people (scientists, engineers, doctors, ...) who will have to rebuild the land after it is cleansed.

    Let me ask you a question: what's the difference between a redneck with a bazooka rollin' down the street in an armoured battle vehicle and a brown person wandering around town wearing a suicide vest?

    Any government that wants to limit armored vehicle use by a civilian (read: hostile threat) has been committing terrible crimes against the people and is afraid of them

    That's only about 10% of the story. The root cause is a gun-totin' culture that has led to fear and an arms race. What might have been a good idea in 1815 before machine guns and anti-tank weapons is not such a great idea now in 2015.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:51AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:51AM (#198623)

    Nice work skipping over the whole 20th century there. I want my own backpack sized nuclear reactor for inner city personal defense and nuking popcorn.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2015, @12:17PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2015, @12:17PM (#198631)

    a brown person wandering around town wearing a suicide vest

    How often do you see brown people in suicide vests? Is it a big problem where you live? Or is it a myth perpetuated by Jewish media special interest groups?

    what's the difference between....

    A redneck with a bazooka in an armored vehicle is an uneducated fool. A brown person wearing an FBI-supplied suicide vest is an educated brain-washed fool.

    • (Score: 2) by turgid on Saturday June 20 2015, @12:27PM

      by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 20 2015, @12:27PM (#198636) Journal

      Let me try again: how often to you see rednecks with quasi-military vehicles, anti-tank weapons and automatic rifles?

      Now, how do you know what the redneck is up to or intends to do [theguardian.com]?

      Who is the greater threat to society?

      Why is the redneck allowed to do this sort of thing under the pretence of "freedom?"

      What is this freedom we speak of?

      • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2015, @03:33PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 20 2015, @03:33PM (#198714)

        Why is the redneck allowed to do this sort of thing under the pretence of "freedom?"

        What is this freedom we speak of?

        That would be the 2nd amendment, which can only be changed with another constitutional amendment. Get to it if you don't like it.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @05:56PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @05:56PM (#199138)

          That would be the 2nd amendment

          If you ignore that whole "A well-regulated militia" part of it, you'd be right. Your fallacy is cherry-picking.