Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:30PM   Printer-friendly

"At some point as a country, we have to reckon with what happens. It's not enough to express sympathy. You don't see this kind of murder, on this scale, with this kind of frequency in other advanced countries on earth." - President Obama.

Discuss.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @08:29AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @08:29AM (#198997)

    US has about 89 guns per 100 people; Switzerland 46 per 100. The US gun homicide rate is actually pretty low and has been decreasing since the beginning of the 90's -- it's a safe country, unless you live in the ghetto and get caught in a gang fight [washingtonpost.com]. There aren't actually all that many of those even, though.

    There are, however, a lot of reporters and 24-hour news channels. Any incident will get plastered on the media and covered constantly, which gives the impression that America is going to hell in a handbasket. Less than one percent of homicides (gun-related or not) involved three or more victims [pewsocialtrends.org], so the rampage-shooting thing is really, really rare. You have a 1:325 chance of dying by gun-related homicide, but a 1:246 chance of dying by falling down, 1:121 of dying by suicide, 1:100 of dying in an auto accident, and 1:7 of dying by cancer. But, cancer and falling down don't make for good news stories.

    If you really want to save American lives, doing something about guns isn't the answer. Working to prevent heart disease and cure cancer is. If black lives really matter to you, and if statistics also actually matter to you, then fight against heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes [cdc.gov]: those are the real killers out there, the ones that actually are going to get you one day, most likely. The fact that black people are at an elevated risk of illness is a real disparity in America. Your chance of dying in a white-supremacist's shooting rampage is, on the other hand, infinitesimally small.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday June 21 2015, @11:24AM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 21 2015, @11:24AM (#199028) Journal

    Working to prevent heart disease and cure cancer is. If black lives really matter to you, and if statistics also actually matter to you, then fight against heart disease, cancer, stroke, and diabetes [cdc.gov]

    I couldn't agree more. I believe that you intended that to be a generic 'you' and not addressed at me personally. I am not an American and do not feel qualified to tell others how they should sort out their country.

    US has about 89 guns per 100 people; Switzerland 46 per 100.

    So you would expect that the number of shootings per capita in Switzerland would be about half that found in America. But it is one tenth. There is something else other than just the availability of weapons. So, ignoring taking weapons away from people, there is still something that can be done to improve the situation.

    unless you live in the ghetto

    I am not knowledgeable about US geography, and I didn't realise that the latest incident took place in a ghetto. The only pictures I have seen of it have been on TV, and the area doesn't look too deprived in those images. I accept your comments regarding the ease by which news can now be disseminated and the way that it can distort public perceptions.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by FatPhil on Sunday June 21 2015, @12:00PM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Sunday June 21 2015, @12:00PM (#199039) Homepage
      Switzerland has a well-regulated militia, that being considered necessary for the security of a free state.

      The USA, however, instead just has guns fuck yeah.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @05:27PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @05:27PM (#199128)

      I am not knowledgeable about US geography, and I didn't realise that the latest incident took place in a ghetto.

      There you go, confusing individual events with data. See http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/09/19/the-racial-divide-in-americas-gun-deaths/ [washingtonpost.com], which the GP linked, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States#Homicide [wikipedia.org] which he/she didn't link. Homicide in the US is very much racially segregated: 93% of blacks killed are killed by blacks. The rate of death by firearm for blacks is twice that for whites. Taken together, that means that blacks are much more likely to murder each other with a firearm than whites are to murder each other, and that it's very unlikely that a white man will shoot a black man. In fact, a white man is five times more likely to commit suicide by gun, a black man five times more likely to be murdered with one, and by another black man at that.

      The latest incident does not conform to that pattern. Not all data does: there are always outliers. The events in Charleston were highly abnormal. They were the work of an abnormal mind bent on doing something far out of line with the rest of society. Do not mistake that for the norm.

      Here's the real problem: you can't effectively guard against highly abnormal events, the "black swans," to use the metaphor common in the financial world. You can, however, use data to predict where resources can be more effectively invested to prevent predictable tragedies. Given that the likelihood of developing diabetes or cancer or heart disease is far greater than that of dying by a homicide, resources need to be invested in those diseases rather than in the edge case of gun-related deaths.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @07:21PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @07:21PM (#199166)

        Something your analysis does not take into account is the impact on the living.

        People who die of diabetes and heart disease tend to be significantly older than the people who die by firearms. They have already contributed a significant amount to their communities. And when they die, the scars left on the living are much more shallow because although premature, the death is neither sudden nor intimidating for the bereaved.

        Also, false dichotomy. Working to fix one problem doesn't preclude working to fix the other.

    • (Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Monday June 22 2015, @02:37AM

      by Joe Desertrat (2454) on Monday June 22 2015, @02:37AM (#199264)

      I am not knowledgeable about US geography, and I didn't realise that the latest incident took place in a ghetto.

      The shooter had nothing to do with the ghetto, it was a white person who came from many miles away and chose a church frequented almost entirely by African-Americans.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @09:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @09:11PM (#199203)

    If you really want to save American lives, doing something about guns isn't the answer. Working to prevent heart disease and cure cancer is.

    Fallacy of relative privation. So what there are things that are worse? That doesn't mean guns aren't a problem that needs to be addressed too.