Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Sunday June 21 2015, @01:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the the-price-of-freedom dept.

Assange's Stay In Embassy Has Cost British Taxpayers $17 Million

Harriet Alexander reports in The Telegraph that Julian Assange's three-year stay in the Ecuadorian embassy has cost British taxpayers more than $17 million for around the clock. police surveillance at the embassy. The Metropolitan Police refused to discuss how many policemen were deployed to the embassy, but they did confirm the cost. The Met said the figure included $10.3m of what they termed "opportunity costs" – police officer pay costs that would be incurred in normal duties – and $4.3m of additional costs such as police overtime. A further $1.7m was put down to "indirect costs" such as administration. Assange challenged his extradition order to Sweden through the courts, but when his appeals failed he absconded and sought refuge inside the embassy of Ecuador – a country whose president has spoken publicly of his support for the 43-year-old computer hacker. Ecuador granted him asylum in August 2012, but as soon as he sets foot outside the building Britain will deport him to Sweden. He has been indoors ever since.

The Swedish director of public prosecutions, Marianne Ny, has grown impatient. In March she said that she would consent, reluctantly, to interview Assange inside the embassy – because the statute of limitations for some of the alleged crimes runs out in August. "Now that time is of the essence, I have viewed it therefore necessary to accept such deficiencies to the investigation and likewise take the risk that the interview does not move the case forward, particularly as there are no other measures on offer without Assange being present in Sweden."

WikiLeaks Publishes New Sony Documents and Saudi Cables

WikiLeaks has added 276,394 new Sony documents to its online searchable database. The site has also uploaded 61,205 documents and cables leaked from the Saudi Arabia Foreign Ministry:

The dump "Sony Files Part 2," appears to coincide with a major social media push from WikiLeaks regarding the three-year anniversary of its founder Julian Assange's stay at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he is remaining to avoid extradition.

The entire library of files in now searchable on WikiLeaks' site where users are able to delve through though all of the emails and documents.

Shortly after publishing the new data, WikiLeaks tweeted a helpful hint to those scouring the documents for information, pointing its Twitter followers to a collection of files that it said showed evidence of "legal entanglements" for Sony Pictures, "including an investigation for bribery."

A press release on WikiLeaks asserted that the 61,205 documents and cables leaked Friday would be the first publication of many for "The Saudi Cables." The group, led by Julian Assange, says it will release over half a million documents in batches over the upcoming weeks.

"The Saudi Cables lift the lid on a increasingly erratic and secretive dictatorship that has not only celebrated its 100th beheading this year, but which has also become a menace to its neighbours and itself," said Assange in the press release.

WikiLeaks announced that internal reports from Saudi government organizations and communications between Saudi embassies across the globe will be included in the documents. The press release states the Saudi Cables "provide key insights into the Kingdom's operations and how it has managed its alliances and consolidated its position as a regional Middle East superpower, including through bribing and co-opting key individuals and institutions."

The group did not attribute the documents to a source directly. The press release did note that the Saudi Foreign Ministry acknowledged a computer network breach in May, and a group called the Yemeni Cyber Army afterward began releasing "sample" classified material to various websites.

Previously:

WikiLeaks Publishes "The Sony Archives"
WikiLeaks Publishes Transcripts of German Inquiry into NSA and BND


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Sunday June 21 2015, @02:18AM

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday June 21 2015, @02:18AM (#198899) Journal

    It it is true the statute of limitations expires in Sweden in August, the British will certainly find some local charges to take their place, such as ignoring court orders etc.

    You would think it would be best for British interests just to let him board on a private jet to Ecuador and be done with the nonsense.
    They run the real risk of keeping him captive when nobody wants him anymore. The US has decided not to pursue him.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday June 21 2015, @02:42AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 21 2015, @02:42AM (#198907) Journal

    The US has decided not to pursue him.

    Ahem... that's what she [wikipedia.org] said

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Monday June 22 2015, @10:38AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Monday June 22 2015, @10:38AM (#199360) Journal

    It it is true the statute of limitations expires in Sweden in August, the British will certainly find some local charges to take their place, such as ignoring court orders

    There is no need to find local charges. Assange is wanted in the UK for violating the terms of his bail granted on December 2010 (for £293,500, mostly paid by Wikileaks supporters, who lost the money). That is the only reason that he is wanted in the UK. The Swedish authorities are willing to interview him in the UK now, so perhaps he'll come out, be interviewed, have the charges dropped, and then go to prison in the UK for bail violation. I doubt that would make him happy though - he could have just agreed to be interviewed in Sweden (whose extradition treaty with the UK prevents him from being further extradited to the UK) and had the charges dropped quickly if he hadn't decided that there was more publicity to be gained in playing the political refugee card.

    You would think it would be best for British interests just to let him board on a private jet to Ecuador and be done with the nonsense.

    I don't think that it's in the British interests at all for it to be seen by criminals that the police won't go after you for bail jumping if it is expensive.

    --
    sudo mod me up